What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?Discovered a serious error in a...
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
How to tag distinct options/entities without giving any an implicit priority or suggested order?
How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?
What is this metal M-shaped device for?
Is a debit card dangerous for an account with low balance and no overdraft protection?
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
How would a Dictatorship make a country more successful?
Can you earn endless XP using a Flameskull and its self-revival feature?
Is there some relative to Dutch word "kijken" in German?
What flying insects could re-enter the Earth's atmosphere from space without burning up?
What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?
Am I a Rude Number?
Contest math problem about crossing out numbers in the table
Why don't American passenger airlines operate dedicated cargo flights any more?
Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing
Isn't using the Extrusion Multiplier like cheating?
Can I write a book of my D&D game?
Why would the Pakistan airspace closure cancel flights not headed to Pakistan itself?
Cryptic with missing capitals
How to convert a ListContourPlot into primitive usable with Graphics3D?
Grade 10 Analytic Geometry Question 23- Incredibly hard
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
Can an insurance company drop you after receiving a bill and refusing to pay?
Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?
What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?
Discovered a serious error in a reviewed paper after submitting the review, what to do?Should I warn my professor about some errors that I've found in his paper?Found errors in paper: What happens now?What to do about accidental, easily corrected errors in a conference paper you already submitted?What to do about an important typo mistake in my submitted conference paper?Will I destroy my career if I published a paper with a serious mistake?Fixed an error in my published paper, and cite the paper in my not-yet-defended thesis. What should I do?What should I do if a paper makes false claims about my work?Serious error in published journal paper by a faculty memberWhat to do if a paper by respected authors has obvious problems, and I have told them so already?
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
add a comment |
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
Letter to the editor and you can publish it in another journal. Not many authors favoring the idea that would correct them, it makes them looks bad.
– Monkia
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
errors-erratum
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 7 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
14k63051
Letter to the editor and you can publish it in another journal. Not many authors favoring the idea that would correct them, it makes them looks bad.
– Monkia
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Letter to the editor and you can publish it in another journal. Not many authors favoring the idea that would correct them, it makes them looks bad.
– Monkia
1 hour ago
Letter to the editor and you can publish it in another journal. Not many authors favoring the idea that would correct them, it makes them looks bad.
– Monkia
1 hour ago
Letter to the editor and you can publish it in another journal. Not many authors favoring the idea that would correct them, it makes them looks bad.
– Monkia
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
3
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125806%2fwhat-to-do-if-authors-dont-respond-to-my-serious-concerns-about-their-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
add a comment |
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
add a comment |
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
answered 7 hours ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118148
39.2k12118148
add a comment |
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
3
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
3
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
answered 6 hours ago
guestguest
843
843
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
3
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
add a comment |
2
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
3
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
2
2
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
6 hours ago
3
3
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125806%2fwhat-to-do-if-authors-dont-respond-to-my-serious-concerns-about-their-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Letter to the editor and you can publish it in another journal. Not many authors favoring the idea that would correct them, it makes them looks bad.
– Monkia
1 hour ago