How to match a user with another user based on their taste?Item based and user based recommendation...

Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?

How do you get out of your own psychology to write characters?

Prevent Nautilus / Nemo from creating .Trash-1000 folder in mounted devices

Is there a file that always exists and a 'normal' user can't lstat it?

What species should be used for storage of human minds?

When obtaining gender reassignment/plastic surgery overseas, is an emergency travel document required to return home?

Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract

How do I prevent a homebrew Grappling Hook feature from trivializing Tomb of Annihilation?

How much mayhem could I cause as a fish?

Does an Eldritch Knight's Weapon Bond protect him from losing his weapon to a Telekinesis spell?

Is there a way to not have to poll the UART of an AVR?

Will rerolling initiative each round stop meta-gaming about initiative?

Why does 0.-5 evaluate to -5?

What's after EXPSPACE?

Why do all the books in Game of Thrones library have their covers facing the back of the shelf?

Custom shape shows unwanted extra line

How to not let the Identify spell spoil everything?

How is this property called for mod?

How does Leonard in "Memento" remember reading and writing?

Plausible reason to leave the Solar System?

Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?

Stuck on a Geometry Puzzle

What is the industry term for house wiring diagrams?

The No-Straight Maze



How to match a user with another user based on their taste?


Item based and user based recommendation difference in MahoutDiscovering non-interesting attributesWhich recommender system approach allows for inclusion of user profile?Translating a business problem into a machine learning solution: job-adds websiteMatching content item to a persons profileHow can I estimate user-item purchase probabilities of a e-commerce website?Can I sum up feature vectors of a user‘s collection?How to create user and item profile in an item to item collaborative filtering? (Non-rating case)Recommender system that connect users with each other , should I go for content based or collaborative filtering?How to match a user with other users with similar interests based on their attributes?













1












$begingroup$


Information available



Consider that there are N users on a platform. Every user adds items that they like on their profile. These items have static attributes that describe the product.



User A:
Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
Item 1| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
Item 2| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
Item 3| 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156

User B:
Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
Item 7| 0.228 | 0.148 | 0.658
Item 8| 0.785 | 0.33 | 0.887
Item 9| 0.569 | 0.994 | 0.374


User A has a list of items that he/she likes. Same goes with User B... User N. The items in the profiles of different users might or might not be the same but the items describe the User's taste for that particular item.



Goal



What I want to do is, match a User with another User if they have a similar taste in picking items. I don't understand how to achieve this. Any help is appreciated!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Information available



    Consider that there are N users on a platform. Every user adds items that they like on their profile. These items have static attributes that describe the product.



    User A:
    Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
    Item 1| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
    Item 2| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
    Item 3| 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156

    User B:
    Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
    Item 7| 0.228 | 0.148 | 0.658
    Item 8| 0.785 | 0.33 | 0.887
    Item 9| 0.569 | 0.994 | 0.374


    User A has a list of items that he/she likes. Same goes with User B... User N. The items in the profiles of different users might or might not be the same but the items describe the User's taste for that particular item.



    Goal



    What I want to do is, match a User with another User if they have a similar taste in picking items. I don't understand how to achieve this. Any help is appreciated!










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Information available



      Consider that there are N users on a platform. Every user adds items that they like on their profile. These items have static attributes that describe the product.



      User A:
      Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
      Item 1| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
      Item 2| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
      Item 3| 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156

      User B:
      Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
      Item 7| 0.228 | 0.148 | 0.658
      Item 8| 0.785 | 0.33 | 0.887
      Item 9| 0.569 | 0.994 | 0.374


      User A has a list of items that he/she likes. Same goes with User B... User N. The items in the profiles of different users might or might not be the same but the items describe the User's taste for that particular item.



      Goal



      What I want to do is, match a User with another User if they have a similar taste in picking items. I don't understand how to achieve this. Any help is appreciated!










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Information available



      Consider that there are N users on a platform. Every user adds items that they like on their profile. These items have static attributes that describe the product.



      User A:
      Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
      Item 1| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
      Item 2| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
      Item 3| 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156

      User B:
      Row | Attribute a | Attribute b | Attribute c
      Item 7| 0.228 | 0.148 | 0.658
      Item 8| 0.785 | 0.33 | 0.887
      Item 9| 0.569 | 0.994 | 0.374


      User A has a list of items that he/she likes. Same goes with User B... User N. The items in the profiles of different users might or might not be the same but the items describe the User's taste for that particular item.



      Goal



      What I want to do is, match a User with another User if they have a similar taste in picking items. I don't understand how to achieve this. Any help is appreciated!







      machine-learning python deep-learning recommender-system






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      Dhaval ThakkarDhaval Thakkar

      186




      186




      New contributor




      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Well you could try unsupervised clustering. You may want to leave out the user and item label to start. Depending on how much data you have and guesses at how many "categories" you might end up with you can use K-means or Mean sift clustering. The idea would be you let the similarities be worked out so that you group the items together and give you the "Categories" and there for the similar items. Then you can use the model for any future.
          After you have done this you can introduce the User labels and item labels to build the similarity at the User level.



          A next step in exploration, depending on the item and attributes, might be reducing the attributes to the average of each item so that one user has averages of each attribute for all items and then use that data. Then you then averages to cluster in terms of types of "user"



          Both ways would assume the attributes for each item is very similar the attributes to the others items. eg



              item  | sweetness   |   acidity   |  bitterness
          orange| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
          banana| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
          apple | 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156


          Or you can just do direct numerical comparison between users so that you calculate something like statistical entropy between the two across all items per attribute, average for all attributes, and set a range so that if in a certain range they are considered similar or different.



          Hope this helps!






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
            $endgroup$
            – Dhaval Thakkar
            yesterday





















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can perform clustering of your customers based on a distance function.
          Definition might look like this:




          1. First, calculate euclidean distances between the first item of the first customer's basket and all of the items in the second customer's basket.

          2. Then find out, what is the closest item from second customer's basket (minimum euclidean distance).

          3. Perform the same operation for each item in first customer's basket.

          4. Calculate mean of the minimum distances.

          5. Do the same for the second customer.

          6. Take maximum of means from the first and the second customer.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Is there a reason why you are not using a content-based recommender system? You can use a recommender to "group" users together and once they are grouped, you can introduce members to each other. I guess I don't understand why you are trying to re-invent the wheel on this one - a recommender can get you to where you want to be.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              As suggested, running a clustering algorithm such as k-Means probably works best. The algorithm can find hidden patterns in your dataset.



              For fun, I used your data to run a k-Means in Tableau (freely available). Tableau makes experimenting with clustering algorithms super easy and fast.



              You see immediately that you have two similar groups (Cluster 1 in blue and Cluste r2 in orange).
              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "557"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });






                Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46147%2fhow-to-match-a-user-with-another-user-based-on-their-taste%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                0












                $begingroup$

                Well you could try unsupervised clustering. You may want to leave out the user and item label to start. Depending on how much data you have and guesses at how many "categories" you might end up with you can use K-means or Mean sift clustering. The idea would be you let the similarities be worked out so that you group the items together and give you the "Categories" and there for the similar items. Then you can use the model for any future.
                After you have done this you can introduce the User labels and item labels to build the similarity at the User level.



                A next step in exploration, depending on the item and attributes, might be reducing the attributes to the average of each item so that one user has averages of each attribute for all items and then use that data. Then you then averages to cluster in terms of types of "user"



                Both ways would assume the attributes for each item is very similar the attributes to the others items. eg



                    item  | sweetness   |   acidity   |  bitterness
                orange| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
                banana| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
                apple | 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156


                Or you can just do direct numerical comparison between users so that you calculate something like statistical entropy between the two across all items per attribute, average for all attributes, and set a range so that if in a certain range they are considered similar or different.



                Hope this helps!






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dhaval Thakkar
                  yesterday


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Well you could try unsupervised clustering. You may want to leave out the user and item label to start. Depending on how much data you have and guesses at how many "categories" you might end up with you can use K-means or Mean sift clustering. The idea would be you let the similarities be worked out so that you group the items together and give you the "Categories" and there for the similar items. Then you can use the model for any future.
                After you have done this you can introduce the User labels and item labels to build the similarity at the User level.



                A next step in exploration, depending on the item and attributes, might be reducing the attributes to the average of each item so that one user has averages of each attribute for all items and then use that data. Then you then averages to cluster in terms of types of "user"



                Both ways would assume the attributes for each item is very similar the attributes to the others items. eg



                    item  | sweetness   |   acidity   |  bitterness
                orange| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
                banana| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
                apple | 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156


                Or you can just do direct numerical comparison between users so that you calculate something like statistical entropy between the two across all items per attribute, average for all attributes, and set a range so that if in a certain range they are considered similar or different.



                Hope this helps!






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dhaval Thakkar
                  yesterday
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Well you could try unsupervised clustering. You may want to leave out the user and item label to start. Depending on how much data you have and guesses at how many "categories" you might end up with you can use K-means or Mean sift clustering. The idea would be you let the similarities be worked out so that you group the items together and give you the "Categories" and there for the similar items. Then you can use the model for any future.
                After you have done this you can introduce the User labels and item labels to build the similarity at the User level.



                A next step in exploration, depending on the item and attributes, might be reducing the attributes to the average of each item so that one user has averages of each attribute for all items and then use that data. Then you then averages to cluster in terms of types of "user"



                Both ways would assume the attributes for each item is very similar the attributes to the others items. eg



                    item  | sweetness   |   acidity   |  bitterness
                orange| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
                banana| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
                apple | 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156


                Or you can just do direct numerical comparison between users so that you calculate something like statistical entropy between the two across all items per attribute, average for all attributes, and set a range so that if in a certain range they are considered similar or different.



                Hope this helps!






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$



                Well you could try unsupervised clustering. You may want to leave out the user and item label to start. Depending on how much data you have and guesses at how many "categories" you might end up with you can use K-means or Mean sift clustering. The idea would be you let the similarities be worked out so that you group the items together and give you the "Categories" and there for the similar items. Then you can use the model for any future.
                After you have done this you can introduce the User labels and item labels to build the similarity at the User level.



                A next step in exploration, depending on the item and attributes, might be reducing the attributes to the average of each item so that one user has averages of each attribute for all items and then use that data. Then you then averages to cluster in terms of types of "user"



                Both ways would assume the attributes for each item is very similar the attributes to the others items. eg



                    item  | sweetness   |   acidity   |  bitterness
                orange| 0.593 | 0.7852 | 0.484
                banana| 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.05
                apple | 0.423 | 0.886 | 0.156


                Or you can just do direct numerical comparison between users so that you calculate something like statistical entropy between the two across all items per attribute, average for all attributes, and set a range so that if in a certain range they are considered similar or different.



                Hope this helps!







                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer






                New contributor




                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered yesterday









                LothiliusLothilius

                11




                11




                New contributor




                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                Lothilius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.












                • $begingroup$
                  the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dhaval Thakkar
                  yesterday




















                • $begingroup$
                  the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dhaval Thakkar
                  yesterday


















                $begingroup$
                the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
                $endgroup$
                – Dhaval Thakkar
                yesterday






                $begingroup$
                the idea of using unsupervised learning is great but that would only be useful if I had a dataset of all the items from which users could add them. The problem I have is that these items and their attributes will be given to me by an API, so there is no chance that I can get the dataset of all items and their attributes. Also, I couldn't understand the part you said after model building to introduce user and item labels for similarities
                $endgroup$
                – Dhaval Thakkar
                yesterday













                0












                $begingroup$

                You can perform clustering of your customers based on a distance function.
                Definition might look like this:




                1. First, calculate euclidean distances between the first item of the first customer's basket and all of the items in the second customer's basket.

                2. Then find out, what is the closest item from second customer's basket (minimum euclidean distance).

                3. Perform the same operation for each item in first customer's basket.

                4. Calculate mean of the minimum distances.

                5. Do the same for the second customer.

                6. Take maximum of means from the first and the second customer.






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  You can perform clustering of your customers based on a distance function.
                  Definition might look like this:




                  1. First, calculate euclidean distances between the first item of the first customer's basket and all of the items in the second customer's basket.

                  2. Then find out, what is the closest item from second customer's basket (minimum euclidean distance).

                  3. Perform the same operation for each item in first customer's basket.

                  4. Calculate mean of the minimum distances.

                  5. Do the same for the second customer.

                  6. Take maximum of means from the first and the second customer.






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    You can perform clustering of your customers based on a distance function.
                    Definition might look like this:




                    1. First, calculate euclidean distances between the first item of the first customer's basket and all of the items in the second customer's basket.

                    2. Then find out, what is the closest item from second customer's basket (minimum euclidean distance).

                    3. Perform the same operation for each item in first customer's basket.

                    4. Calculate mean of the minimum distances.

                    5. Do the same for the second customer.

                    6. Take maximum of means from the first and the second customer.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$



                    You can perform clustering of your customers based on a distance function.
                    Definition might look like this:




                    1. First, calculate euclidean distances between the first item of the first customer's basket and all of the items in the second customer's basket.

                    2. Then find out, what is the closest item from second customer's basket (minimum euclidean distance).

                    3. Perform the same operation for each item in first customer's basket.

                    4. Calculate mean of the minimum distances.

                    5. Do the same for the second customer.

                    6. Take maximum of means from the first and the second customer.







                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 4 hours ago









                    naive

                    2366




                    2366






                    New contributor




                    Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered yesterday









                    Michał KardachMichał Kardach

                    14




                    14




                    New contributor




                    Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Michał Kardach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Is there a reason why you are not using a content-based recommender system? You can use a recommender to "group" users together and once they are grouped, you can introduce members to each other. I guess I don't understand why you are trying to re-invent the wheel on this one - a recommender can get you to where you want to be.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Is there a reason why you are not using a content-based recommender system? You can use a recommender to "group" users together and once they are grouped, you can introduce members to each other. I guess I don't understand why you are trying to re-invent the wheel on this one - a recommender can get you to where you want to be.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Is there a reason why you are not using a content-based recommender system? You can use a recommender to "group" users together and once they are grouped, you can introduce members to each other. I guess I don't understand why you are trying to re-invent the wheel on this one - a recommender can get you to where you want to be.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Is there a reason why you are not using a content-based recommender system? You can use a recommender to "group" users together and once they are grouped, you can introduce members to each other. I guess I don't understand why you are trying to re-invent the wheel on this one - a recommender can get you to where you want to be.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 4 hours ago









                            I_Play_With_DataI_Play_With_Data

                            1,009422




                            1,009422























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                As suggested, running a clustering algorithm such as k-Means probably works best. The algorithm can find hidden patterns in your dataset.



                                For fun, I used your data to run a k-Means in Tableau (freely available). Tableau makes experimenting with clustering algorithms super easy and fast.



                                You see immediately that you have two similar groups (Cluster 1 in blue and Cluste r2 in orange).
                                enter image description here






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  As suggested, running a clustering algorithm such as k-Means probably works best. The algorithm can find hidden patterns in your dataset.



                                  For fun, I used your data to run a k-Means in Tableau (freely available). Tableau makes experimenting with clustering algorithms super easy and fast.



                                  You see immediately that you have two similar groups (Cluster 1 in blue and Cluste r2 in orange).
                                  enter image description here






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    As suggested, running a clustering algorithm such as k-Means probably works best. The algorithm can find hidden patterns in your dataset.



                                    For fun, I used your data to run a k-Means in Tableau (freely available). Tableau makes experimenting with clustering algorithms super easy and fast.



                                    You see immediately that you have two similar groups (Cluster 1 in blue and Cluste r2 in orange).
                                    enter image description here






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    As suggested, running a clustering algorithm such as k-Means probably works best. The algorithm can find hidden patterns in your dataset.



                                    For fun, I used your data to run a k-Means in Tableau (freely available). Tableau makes experimenting with clustering algorithms super easy and fast.



                                    You see immediately that you have two similar groups (Cluster 1 in blue and Cluste r2 in orange).
                                    enter image description here







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 1 hour ago









                                    FrancoSwissFrancoSwiss

                                    8115




                                    8115






















                                        Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded


















                                        Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                        Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                        Dhaval Thakkar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46147%2fhow-to-match-a-user-with-another-user-based-on-their-taste%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Webac Holding Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Organisationsstruktur | Tochterfirmen |...

                                        What's the meaning of a knight fighting a snail in medieval book illustrations?What is the meaning of a glove...

                                        Salamanca Inhaltsverzeichnis Lage und Klima | Bevölkerungsentwicklung | Geschichte | Kultur und...