Should I cite R or RStudio?How should I cite products?How should I cite presentation slides?Should I cite all...
How do I prevent a homebrew Grappling Hook feature from trivializing Tomb of Annihilation?
What to do with threats of blacklisting?
Is there a way to store 9th-level spells in a Glyph of Warding or similar method?
The No-Straight Maze
What's this assembly doing?
What is the industry term for house wiring diagrams?
Taking headphones when quitting job
What's the oldest plausible frozen specimen for a Jurassic Park style story-line?
Broad Strokes - missing letter riddle
Can you determine if focus is sharp without diopter adjustment if your sight is imperfect?
Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night
Not a Long-Winded Riddle
Translation needed for 130 years old church document
How big is a framed opening for a door relative to the finished door opening width?
Which RAF squadrons and aircraft types took part in the bombing of Berlin on the 25th of August 1940?
Book where a space ship journeys to the center of the galaxy to find all the stars had gone supernova
Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?
Plausible reason to leave the Solar System?
How does Leonard in "Memento" remember reading and writing?
What species should be used for storage of human minds?
Website seeing my Facebook data?
How is this property called for mod?
Is `Object` a function in javascript?
What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?
Should I cite R or RStudio?
How should I cite products?How should I cite presentation slides?Should I cite all R packages I used?How should I cite 3 images that were used to compose a new image?How can I cite my dissertation in a paper that will be double-blind reviewed?What papers can you ask someone to cite for using your software?Should I (as a reviewer) ask an author to cite my work where I proposed a core hypothesis, when they have already referenced other points?How to reference self-collected corpusHow to cite an interactive dataviz (Shiny app)?Using a statistical method in an applied context for (probably) the first time. How do I convey this?
I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?
citations statistics
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?
citations statistics
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
6
I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word
– Azor Ahai
5 hours ago
add a comment |
I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?
citations statistics
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?
citations statistics
citations statistics
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
asked 5 hours ago
BugBoiBugBoi
111
111
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
6
I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word
– Azor Ahai
5 hours ago
add a comment |
6
I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word
– Azor Ahai
5 hours ago
6
6
I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word
– Azor Ahai
5 hours ago
I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word
– Azor Ahai
5 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
add a comment |
Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.
Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.
Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
2
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125536%2fshould-i-cite-r-or-rstudio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
add a comment |
RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
add a comment |
RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
answered 5 hours ago
Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov
26.1k1055108
26.1k1055108
add a comment |
add a comment |
Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.
Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.
Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.
Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.
Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
answered 3 hours ago
Bryan KrauseBryan Krause
13.4k13862
13.4k13862
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.
– Azor Ahai
2 hours ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
@AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.
– Bryan Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.
Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
2
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.
Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
2
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.
Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.
Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
48.7k13159243
48.7k13159243
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
2
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
2
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
1
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
@BryanKrause You may well be right, but one would hope that a downvote would be more carefully considered than that (and, of course, explained in a Comment.
– JeremyC
3 hours ago
1
1
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
@JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.
– Bryan Krause
3 hours ago
2
2
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.
– Federico Poloni
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125536%2fshould-i-cite-r-or-rstudio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word
– Azor Ahai
5 hours ago