What is the standard way to address written statements presented as evidence in a civil case?Is there any way...
Why don't hotels mount air conditioning units outside the rooms?
Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?
Difference between i++ and (i)++ in C
Why would space fleets be aligned?
Aligning symbols underneath each other neatly
A Missing Symbol for This Logo
Is boss over stepping boundary/micromanaging?
Is it possible to grant users sftp access without shell access? If yes, how is it implemented?
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
Why exactly do action photographers need high fps burst cameras?
Consequences of lack of rigour
Making him into a bully (how to show mild violence)
What evolutionary advantage do viruses have in host specificity?
What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?
Finding a logistic regression model which can achieve zero error on a training set training data for a binary classification problem with two features
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?
What would the chemical name be for C13H8Cl3NO
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Mathematics and the art of linearizing the circle
What to look for when criticizing poetry?
What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?
What is the standard way to address written statements presented as evidence in a civil case?
Is there any way to bring a criminal case before the grand jury without the support of the Prosecuting Attorney?What does “declare under penalty of perjury” mean within a federal civil case?What are the statutes of limitation for civil lawsuits regarding utility bills between roommates?What is the anatomy of a small claims case?What are the limits on categorising someone's statements as 'hatred' in regard to freedom of speech?What is the correct way of communicating with the Family Court in the UK?What is it called when a petitioner in a civil case asks for ruling on a point of law?Why was video evidence released after the trial ended in the Daniel Shaver murder case?What is the legal standard of proof required for US citizenship?Is it common to have both a criminal case and a civil case for the same incident?
A friend of mine is suing someone. I (and others) witnessed all of the violations that are claimed, but I'm unable to attend the hearing in person for various reasons (mainly that I've moved out of state).
I'm writing a statement for my friend to present in the case, and wasn't sure how to address it. My plan was to use
To Whom It May Concern
or
To All Interested Parties:
or
To the court
or
Dear <Judge's Name>,
or
Your honor, complainants, respondents, and witnesses:
But I don't know that any of these are considered appropriate. Most likely I will choose the first.
What is the standard form of address in written statements to be presented during civil proceedings? Also, who is actually being addressed here?
united-states california civil-procedure
New contributor
add a comment |
A friend of mine is suing someone. I (and others) witnessed all of the violations that are claimed, but I'm unable to attend the hearing in person for various reasons (mainly that I've moved out of state).
I'm writing a statement for my friend to present in the case, and wasn't sure how to address it. My plan was to use
To Whom It May Concern
or
To All Interested Parties:
or
To the court
or
Dear <Judge's Name>,
or
Your honor, complainants, respondents, and witnesses:
But I don't know that any of these are considered appropriate. Most likely I will choose the first.
What is the standard form of address in written statements to be presented during civil proceedings? Also, who is actually being addressed here?
united-states california civil-procedure
New contributor
add a comment |
A friend of mine is suing someone. I (and others) witnessed all of the violations that are claimed, but I'm unable to attend the hearing in person for various reasons (mainly that I've moved out of state).
I'm writing a statement for my friend to present in the case, and wasn't sure how to address it. My plan was to use
To Whom It May Concern
or
To All Interested Parties:
or
To the court
or
Dear <Judge's Name>,
or
Your honor, complainants, respondents, and witnesses:
But I don't know that any of these are considered appropriate. Most likely I will choose the first.
What is the standard form of address in written statements to be presented during civil proceedings? Also, who is actually being addressed here?
united-states california civil-procedure
New contributor
A friend of mine is suing someone. I (and others) witnessed all of the violations that are claimed, but I'm unable to attend the hearing in person for various reasons (mainly that I've moved out of state).
I'm writing a statement for my friend to present in the case, and wasn't sure how to address it. My plan was to use
To Whom It May Concern
or
To All Interested Parties:
or
To the court
or
Dear <Judge's Name>,
or
Your honor, complainants, respondents, and witnesses:
But I don't know that any of these are considered appropriate. Most likely I will choose the first.
What is the standard form of address in written statements to be presented during civil proceedings? Also, who is actually being addressed here?
united-states california civil-procedure
united-states california civil-procedure
New contributor
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
Hugo
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
HugoHugo
1063
1063
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
How should I address a statement to be presented as evidence in a civil case?
The way of addressing the readers is irrelevant. What matters is that the statements your affidavit (which is what you really should produce) be concise and unequivocal so that it is not discarded for purposes of fact-finding.
Your affidavit will (or at least it should) be read by the judge, the jury, all parties/lawyers in the case, and (if the ruling of the case is appealed) judges in upper courts. Witnesses and other non-parties are also likely to read your testimony. In fact, you can only expect the defendant(s) through counsel(s) will dispute your credibility in their attempt to impeach/strike your testimony.
add a comment |
As the answer by Iñaki Viggers says, you should submit an affidavit, not simply a letter to the court. An unsworn letter will probably not be admissible at all.
It is common for a witness to tell his or her story to the lawyer for the side that wishes to use the affidavit, and for the lawyer to then draft the actual affidavit in such a way that it will be acceptable to the court where it will be used. Then the lawyer sends it to the affiant (the person who would be a witness if s/he came to court, who is making the affidavit) with instructions. Generally an affidavit must be notarized or otherwise sworn to in front of an appropriate official.
However, a person can draft his or her own affidavit. It is usual for it to be headed with the name and case number of the case where it will be used. It should include a statement that everything in it is true, and that the affiant swears (or affirms) this under penalty of perjury. It should include only relevant facts that the affiant has personally witnessed, not anything heard from anyone else, or guessed at or deduced.
The facts should be stated clearly and simply.
The affidavit should be signed in the presence of a notary, who will witness the signature and the oath that the contents are true.
This WikiHow page describes the process in detail, with a template form.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Hugo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37685%2fwhat-is-the-standard-way-to-address-written-statements-presented-as-evidence-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
How should I address a statement to be presented as evidence in a civil case?
The way of addressing the readers is irrelevant. What matters is that the statements your affidavit (which is what you really should produce) be concise and unequivocal so that it is not discarded for purposes of fact-finding.
Your affidavit will (or at least it should) be read by the judge, the jury, all parties/lawyers in the case, and (if the ruling of the case is appealed) judges in upper courts. Witnesses and other non-parties are also likely to read your testimony. In fact, you can only expect the defendant(s) through counsel(s) will dispute your credibility in their attempt to impeach/strike your testimony.
add a comment |
How should I address a statement to be presented as evidence in a civil case?
The way of addressing the readers is irrelevant. What matters is that the statements your affidavit (which is what you really should produce) be concise and unequivocal so that it is not discarded for purposes of fact-finding.
Your affidavit will (or at least it should) be read by the judge, the jury, all parties/lawyers in the case, and (if the ruling of the case is appealed) judges in upper courts. Witnesses and other non-parties are also likely to read your testimony. In fact, you can only expect the defendant(s) through counsel(s) will dispute your credibility in their attempt to impeach/strike your testimony.
add a comment |
How should I address a statement to be presented as evidence in a civil case?
The way of addressing the readers is irrelevant. What matters is that the statements your affidavit (which is what you really should produce) be concise and unequivocal so that it is not discarded for purposes of fact-finding.
Your affidavit will (or at least it should) be read by the judge, the jury, all parties/lawyers in the case, and (if the ruling of the case is appealed) judges in upper courts. Witnesses and other non-parties are also likely to read your testimony. In fact, you can only expect the defendant(s) through counsel(s) will dispute your credibility in their attempt to impeach/strike your testimony.
How should I address a statement to be presented as evidence in a civil case?
The way of addressing the readers is irrelevant. What matters is that the statements your affidavit (which is what you really should produce) be concise and unequivocal so that it is not discarded for purposes of fact-finding.
Your affidavit will (or at least it should) be read by the judge, the jury, all parties/lawyers in the case, and (if the ruling of the case is appealed) judges in upper courts. Witnesses and other non-parties are also likely to read your testimony. In fact, you can only expect the defendant(s) through counsel(s) will dispute your credibility in their attempt to impeach/strike your testimony.
answered 5 hours ago
Iñaki ViggersIñaki Viggers
8,30721025
8,30721025
add a comment |
add a comment |
As the answer by Iñaki Viggers says, you should submit an affidavit, not simply a letter to the court. An unsworn letter will probably not be admissible at all.
It is common for a witness to tell his or her story to the lawyer for the side that wishes to use the affidavit, and for the lawyer to then draft the actual affidavit in such a way that it will be acceptable to the court where it will be used. Then the lawyer sends it to the affiant (the person who would be a witness if s/he came to court, who is making the affidavit) with instructions. Generally an affidavit must be notarized or otherwise sworn to in front of an appropriate official.
However, a person can draft his or her own affidavit. It is usual for it to be headed with the name and case number of the case where it will be used. It should include a statement that everything in it is true, and that the affiant swears (or affirms) this under penalty of perjury. It should include only relevant facts that the affiant has personally witnessed, not anything heard from anyone else, or guessed at or deduced.
The facts should be stated clearly and simply.
The affidavit should be signed in the presence of a notary, who will witness the signature and the oath that the contents are true.
This WikiHow page describes the process in detail, with a template form.
add a comment |
As the answer by Iñaki Viggers says, you should submit an affidavit, not simply a letter to the court. An unsworn letter will probably not be admissible at all.
It is common for a witness to tell his or her story to the lawyer for the side that wishes to use the affidavit, and for the lawyer to then draft the actual affidavit in such a way that it will be acceptable to the court where it will be used. Then the lawyer sends it to the affiant (the person who would be a witness if s/he came to court, who is making the affidavit) with instructions. Generally an affidavit must be notarized or otherwise sworn to in front of an appropriate official.
However, a person can draft his or her own affidavit. It is usual for it to be headed with the name and case number of the case where it will be used. It should include a statement that everything in it is true, and that the affiant swears (or affirms) this under penalty of perjury. It should include only relevant facts that the affiant has personally witnessed, not anything heard from anyone else, or guessed at or deduced.
The facts should be stated clearly and simply.
The affidavit should be signed in the presence of a notary, who will witness the signature and the oath that the contents are true.
This WikiHow page describes the process in detail, with a template form.
add a comment |
As the answer by Iñaki Viggers says, you should submit an affidavit, not simply a letter to the court. An unsworn letter will probably not be admissible at all.
It is common for a witness to tell his or her story to the lawyer for the side that wishes to use the affidavit, and for the lawyer to then draft the actual affidavit in such a way that it will be acceptable to the court where it will be used. Then the lawyer sends it to the affiant (the person who would be a witness if s/he came to court, who is making the affidavit) with instructions. Generally an affidavit must be notarized or otherwise sworn to in front of an appropriate official.
However, a person can draft his or her own affidavit. It is usual for it to be headed with the name and case number of the case where it will be used. It should include a statement that everything in it is true, and that the affiant swears (or affirms) this under penalty of perjury. It should include only relevant facts that the affiant has personally witnessed, not anything heard from anyone else, or guessed at or deduced.
The facts should be stated clearly and simply.
The affidavit should be signed in the presence of a notary, who will witness the signature and the oath that the contents are true.
This WikiHow page describes the process in detail, with a template form.
As the answer by Iñaki Viggers says, you should submit an affidavit, not simply a letter to the court. An unsworn letter will probably not be admissible at all.
It is common for a witness to tell his or her story to the lawyer for the side that wishes to use the affidavit, and for the lawyer to then draft the actual affidavit in such a way that it will be acceptable to the court where it will be used. Then the lawyer sends it to the affiant (the person who would be a witness if s/he came to court, who is making the affidavit) with instructions. Generally an affidavit must be notarized or otherwise sworn to in front of an appropriate official.
However, a person can draft his or her own affidavit. It is usual for it to be headed with the name and case number of the case where it will be used. It should include a statement that everything in it is true, and that the affiant swears (or affirms) this under penalty of perjury. It should include only relevant facts that the affiant has personally witnessed, not anything heard from anyone else, or guessed at or deduced.
The facts should be stated clearly and simply.
The affidavit should be signed in the presence of a notary, who will witness the signature and the oath that the contents are true.
This WikiHow page describes the process in detail, with a template form.
answered 4 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
11.3k2146
11.3k2146
add a comment |
add a comment |
Hugo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hugo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hugo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hugo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37685%2fwhat-is-the-standard-way-to-address-written-statements-presented-as-evidence-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown