Given a list of coordinates, find the rectangle with minimal area Announcing the arrival of...
What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?
What's the point in a preamp?
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
What's the difference between (size_t)-1 and ~0?
Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers
Area of a 2D convex hull
How to stop my camera from exagerrating differences in skin colour?
Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform
Simulating Exploding Dice
Unable to start mainnet node docker container
How to rotate it perfectly?
Biased dice probability question
Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?
Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?
Slither Like a Snake
Autumning in love
When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?
Given a list of coordinates, find the rectangle with minimal area
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Std lib-like C++ function to find nearest elements in a containerFind Triangle Triplets from a list of given numbersFind non duplicateTriangle Triplets from a list of given numbersCalculating the area of a circleCalculate area and perimeter for shapes: polygon, circle, rectangle and triangle - follow upAnother way to find the nearest neighbor points in a 2D planeShifting the origin of a large list of coordinatesFinding non-self-intersecting paths of certain moves that touch all points in a gridPortability in using up-and-coming library featuresFind the first palindrome larger than the given number
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0
if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.
I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores in the 96th percentile of solutions on speed, and 100th percentile on memory, so I don't expect any drastic improvements. I'm posting this code because I think it's good, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually good or not -- this is my first post on code review.
Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution
with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points)
, and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points)
, which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points
in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points
is at construction time.
This problem seems to call for something like a multimap
from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points
. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)
My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.
An example test case would look like this
int main ()
{
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
Solution sol;
std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
return 0;
}
Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.
My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only
which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only)
, which will take me to the next entry of points
that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc
.
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;
bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
}
bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
}
class Solution {
//"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
public:
int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {
if (_points.size() < 4)
return 0;
std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);
points = &_points;
int record_min_area = INT_MAX;
for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
continue;
for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
continue;
int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];
if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.
int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);
if (min_distance_sc == 0)
continue; // if they don't have two scs in common
record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
} // for loop, right fc
} // for loop, left fc
if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_area;
}
private:
int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
// given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
// with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
// (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.
int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;
auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {
if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {
if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
++current_left_sc;
else
++current_right_sc;
} // while loop going through two ranges
if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_distance;
}
static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
}
bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
}
coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
}
std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
};
c++
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0
if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.
I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores in the 96th percentile of solutions on speed, and 100th percentile on memory, so I don't expect any drastic improvements. I'm posting this code because I think it's good, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually good or not -- this is my first post on code review.
Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution
with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points)
, and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points)
, which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points
in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points
is at construction time.
This problem seems to call for something like a multimap
from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points
. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)
My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.
An example test case would look like this
int main ()
{
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
Solution sol;
std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
return 0;
}
Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.
My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only
which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only)
, which will take me to the next entry of points
that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc
.
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;
bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
}
bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
}
class Solution {
//"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
public:
int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {
if (_points.size() < 4)
return 0;
std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);
points = &_points;
int record_min_area = INT_MAX;
for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
continue;
for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
continue;
int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];
if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.
int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);
if (min_distance_sc == 0)
continue; // if they don't have two scs in common
record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
} // for loop, right fc
} // for loop, left fc
if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_area;
}
private:
int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
// given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
// with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
// (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.
int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;
auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {
if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {
if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
++current_left_sc;
else
++current_right_sc;
} // while loop going through two ranges
if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_distance;
}
static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
}
bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
}
coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
}
std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
};
c++
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0
if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.
I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores in the 96th percentile of solutions on speed, and 100th percentile on memory, so I don't expect any drastic improvements. I'm posting this code because I think it's good, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually good or not -- this is my first post on code review.
Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution
with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points)
, and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points)
, which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points
in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points
is at construction time.
This problem seems to call for something like a multimap
from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points
. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)
My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.
An example test case would look like this
int main ()
{
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
Solution sol;
std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
return 0;
}
Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.
My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only
which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only)
, which will take me to the next entry of points
that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc
.
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;
bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
}
bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
}
class Solution {
//"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
public:
int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {
if (_points.size() < 4)
return 0;
std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);
points = &_points;
int record_min_area = INT_MAX;
for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
continue;
for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
continue;
int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];
if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.
int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);
if (min_distance_sc == 0)
continue; // if they don't have two scs in common
record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
} // for loop, right fc
} // for loop, left fc
if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_area;
}
private:
int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
// given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
// with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
// (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.
int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;
auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {
if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {
if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
++current_left_sc;
else
++current_right_sc;
} // while loop going through two ranges
if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_distance;
}
static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
}
bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
}
coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
}
std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
};
c++
New contributor
$endgroup$
A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0
if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.
I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores in the 96th percentile of solutions on speed, and 100th percentile on memory, so I don't expect any drastic improvements. I'm posting this code because I think it's good, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually good or not -- this is my first post on code review.
Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution
with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points)
, and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points)
, which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points
in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points
is at construction time.
This problem seems to call for something like a multimap
from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points
. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)
My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.
An example test case would look like this
int main ()
{
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
Solution sol;
std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
return 0;
}
Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.
My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only
which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only)
, which will take me to the next entry of points
that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc
.
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;
bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
}
bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
}
class Solution {
//"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
public:
int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {
if (_points.size() < 4)
return 0;
std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);
points = &_points;
int record_min_area = INT_MAX;
for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
continue;
for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
continue;
int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];
if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.
int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);
if (min_distance_sc == 0)
continue; // if they don't have two scs in common
record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
} // for loop, right fc
} // for loop, left fc
if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_area;
}
private:
int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
// given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
// with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
// (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.
int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;
auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {
if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {
if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}
if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
++current_left_sc;
else
++current_right_sc;
} // while loop going through two ranges
if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_distance;
}
static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
}
bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
}
coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
}
std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
};
c++
c++
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 mins ago
Eric AuldEric Auld
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217465%2fgiven-a-list-of-coordinates-find-the-rectangle-with-minimal-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217465%2fgiven-a-list-of-coordinates-find-the-rectangle-with-minimal-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown