How many of these lines lie entirely in the interior of the original cube? [on hold]How many disconnected...

What does routing an IP address mean?

Non-trope happy ending?

The probability of Bus A arriving before Bus B

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

How does the math work for Perception checks?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos' actions in Infinity War

Lowest total scrabble score

Does collectivism actually exist?

How could a planet have erratic days?

What is going wrong in this circuit which supposedly should step down AC to arduino friendly voltage?

sed '/^$/d' and grep -Ev '^$' failed to remove blank lines

Does a log transform always bring a distribution closer to normal?

Evaluating expression with Integer part and Fraction part of a nested radical

Are paving bricks differently sized for sand bedding vs mortar bedding?

New brakes for 90s road bike

What will be next at the bottom row and why?

Does the Location of Line-Dash-Wedge Notations Matter?

If magnesium reacts with oxygen to produce magnesium oxide only on the application of heat, then why isn't it categorised as an endothermic reaction?

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

The screen of my macbook suddenly broken down how can I do to recover

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

What changes for testers when they are testing in agile environments?



How many of these lines lie entirely in the interior of the original cube? [on hold]


How many disconnected graphs of the Rubik's cube exist?Measuring angles in a prismFind the area of an equilateral triangle given the distances from an interior point to the verticesSubdivided icosahedron points do not lie on circumscribed sphereGiven an $n times n$ square grid, how many ways can we remove $k$ vertices with the graph still connected?What is the upper bound of $Runderbrace{(3,3,3, ldots,3)}_text{$k$ times}$?geometry/combinatorics question: max # intersections of lines in a triangleRandom point inside a trianglePlane Geometry using Complex NumbersHow many edges are on the graph connecting points of ${0, 1}^n$ that differ by only one coordinate?













3












$begingroup$


A portion of a wooden cube is sawed off at each vertex so that a small equilateral triangle is formed at each corner with vertices on the edges of the cube. The $24$ vertices of the new object are all connected to each other by straight lines. How many of these lines (with the exception, of course, of their end-points) lie entirely in the interior of the original cube?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan Mar 20 at 6:15


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This is an interesting puzzle. Where does it come from? is this a homework exercise? in what class? What motivates the problem? why are you interested in it? and why should we be interested in it? At the very least, please indicate what you have attempted to do, and perhaps explain what tools (theorems, definitions, etc) you have access to.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Mar 14 at 19:07
















3












$begingroup$


A portion of a wooden cube is sawed off at each vertex so that a small equilateral triangle is formed at each corner with vertices on the edges of the cube. The $24$ vertices of the new object are all connected to each other by straight lines. How many of these lines (with the exception, of course, of their end-points) lie entirely in the interior of the original cube?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan Mar 20 at 6:15


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This is an interesting puzzle. Where does it come from? is this a homework exercise? in what class? What motivates the problem? why are you interested in it? and why should we be interested in it? At the very least, please indicate what you have attempted to do, and perhaps explain what tools (theorems, definitions, etc) you have access to.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Mar 14 at 19:07














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


A portion of a wooden cube is sawed off at each vertex so that a small equilateral triangle is formed at each corner with vertices on the edges of the cube. The $24$ vertices of the new object are all connected to each other by straight lines. How many of these lines (with the exception, of course, of their end-points) lie entirely in the interior of the original cube?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A portion of a wooden cube is sawed off at each vertex so that a small equilateral triangle is formed at each corner with vertices on the edges of the cube. The $24$ vertices of the new object are all connected to each other by straight lines. How many of these lines (with the exception, of course, of their end-points) lie entirely in the interior of the original cube?







combinatorics geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 14 at 13:48









Parcly Taxel

44.7k1376110




44.7k1376110










asked Mar 14 at 13:35









Mittal GMittal G

1,379516




1,379516




put on hold as off-topic by Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan Mar 20 at 6:15


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan Mar 20 at 6:15


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alex Provost, Lord Shark the Unknown, Eevee Trainer, YiFan

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This is an interesting puzzle. Where does it come from? is this a homework exercise? in what class? What motivates the problem? why are you interested in it? and why should we be interested in it? At the very least, please indicate what you have attempted to do, and perhaps explain what tools (theorems, definitions, etc) you have access to.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Mar 14 at 19:07














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This is an interesting puzzle. Where does it come from? is this a homework exercise? in what class? What motivates the problem? why are you interested in it? and why should we be interested in it? At the very least, please indicate what you have attempted to do, and perhaps explain what tools (theorems, definitions, etc) you have access to.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Mar 14 at 19:07








6




6




$begingroup$
This is an interesting puzzle. Where does it come from? is this a homework exercise? in what class? What motivates the problem? why are you interested in it? and why should we be interested in it? At the very least, please indicate what you have attempted to do, and perhaps explain what tools (theorems, definitions, etc) you have access to.
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Mar 14 at 19:07




$begingroup$
This is an interesting puzzle. Where does it come from? is this a homework exercise? in what class? What motivates the problem? why are you interested in it? and why should we be interested in it? At the very least, please indicate what you have attempted to do, and perhaps explain what tools (theorems, definitions, etc) you have access to.
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Mar 14 at 19:07










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Alternatively, consider four-storey building with $8,4,4,8$ points labeled $1$ through $24$:



$hspace{3cm}$enter image description here



First floor: Number $1$ can connect with none on the first floor. $1$ can connect with ${11,12}$ on the second floor, with ${15,16}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22,23,24}$ on the fourth floor. So, $1$ can connect with $2+2+6=10$ points, so does each of $2-8$, hence: $8cdot 10=color{red}{80}$.



Second floor: Number $9$ can connect with none on the first floor. $9$ can connect with ${11}$ on the second floor, so does $10$ with $12$. Hence: $color{red}{2}$ connections on the second floor only. $9$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $9$ can connect with $1+4=5$ points on the third and fourth floors, so does each each of ${10,11,12}$, hence: $4cdot 5=color{red}{20}$. Overall, $color{red}{22}$ connections.



Third floor: $13$ can connect with none on the first or second floor. $13$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor, so does $14$ with $16$, hence $color{red}{2}$ connections on the third floor only. $13$ can connect with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $13$ can connect with $4$ points on the fourth floor, so does each of ${14,15,16}$, hence: $4cdot 4=color{red}{16}$. Overall, $color{red}{18}$ connections.



Fourth floor: $17$ can connect with none on the first, second, third or fourth floor. So does each other on the fourth floor.



Hence, the number of inner connections is: $color{red}{80}+color{red}{22}+color{red}{18}=120$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    something is missing, let me double check
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    now it is fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
    $endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 14 at 19:10










  • $begingroup$
    David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 19:34



















14












$begingroup$

In the resulting truncated cube, each vertex $v$ is incident to one triangle and two octagons, which together have $3+8+8-3-3=13$ vertices between them excluding $v$. Lines from $v$ to these $13$ vertices will not be completely in the cube; lines to the other $24-13-1=10$ vertices will. Since each connecting line is incident to two vertices, there are $frac{24cdot10}2=120$ interior lines.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
    $endgroup$
    – antkam
    Mar 14 at 18:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 14 at 18:31












  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 15 at 1:02



















7












$begingroup$

Every one of them that does not run along a face.



Each octahedral face of the object, of which there are $6,$ contains $8$ vertices, so there are $6{8 choose 2}=168$ segments along those faces. The segments that are part of the $12$ original edges of the cube are counted twice, so we subtract $12$, leaving $156$ segments on the octagonal faces of the object.



The triangular faces have segments running along them, but we have already counted those because they also run along an octahedral face. There are ${24 choose 2}=276$ line segments, so there are $276-156=120$ running through the body of the object.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 14 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 14 at 13:45


















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

Alternatively, consider four-storey building with $8,4,4,8$ points labeled $1$ through $24$:



$hspace{3cm}$enter image description here



First floor: Number $1$ can connect with none on the first floor. $1$ can connect with ${11,12}$ on the second floor, with ${15,16}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22,23,24}$ on the fourth floor. So, $1$ can connect with $2+2+6=10$ points, so does each of $2-8$, hence: $8cdot 10=color{red}{80}$.



Second floor: Number $9$ can connect with none on the first floor. $9$ can connect with ${11}$ on the second floor, so does $10$ with $12$. Hence: $color{red}{2}$ connections on the second floor only. $9$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $9$ can connect with $1+4=5$ points on the third and fourth floors, so does each each of ${10,11,12}$, hence: $4cdot 5=color{red}{20}$. Overall, $color{red}{22}$ connections.



Third floor: $13$ can connect with none on the first or second floor. $13$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor, so does $14$ with $16$, hence $color{red}{2}$ connections on the third floor only. $13$ can connect with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $13$ can connect with $4$ points on the fourth floor, so does each of ${14,15,16}$, hence: $4cdot 4=color{red}{16}$. Overall, $color{red}{18}$ connections.



Fourth floor: $17$ can connect with none on the first, second, third or fourth floor. So does each other on the fourth floor.



Hence, the number of inner connections is: $color{red}{80}+color{red}{22}+color{red}{18}=120$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    something is missing, let me double check
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    now it is fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
    $endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 14 at 19:10










  • $begingroup$
    David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 19:34
















5












$begingroup$

Alternatively, consider four-storey building with $8,4,4,8$ points labeled $1$ through $24$:



$hspace{3cm}$enter image description here



First floor: Number $1$ can connect with none on the first floor. $1$ can connect with ${11,12}$ on the second floor, with ${15,16}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22,23,24}$ on the fourth floor. So, $1$ can connect with $2+2+6=10$ points, so does each of $2-8$, hence: $8cdot 10=color{red}{80}$.



Second floor: Number $9$ can connect with none on the first floor. $9$ can connect with ${11}$ on the second floor, so does $10$ with $12$. Hence: $color{red}{2}$ connections on the second floor only. $9$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $9$ can connect with $1+4=5$ points on the third and fourth floors, so does each each of ${10,11,12}$, hence: $4cdot 5=color{red}{20}$. Overall, $color{red}{22}$ connections.



Third floor: $13$ can connect with none on the first or second floor. $13$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor, so does $14$ with $16$, hence $color{red}{2}$ connections on the third floor only. $13$ can connect with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $13$ can connect with $4$ points on the fourth floor, so does each of ${14,15,16}$, hence: $4cdot 4=color{red}{16}$. Overall, $color{red}{18}$ connections.



Fourth floor: $17$ can connect with none on the first, second, third or fourth floor. So does each other on the fourth floor.



Hence, the number of inner connections is: $color{red}{80}+color{red}{22}+color{red}{18}=120$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    something is missing, let me double check
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    now it is fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
    $endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 14 at 19:10










  • $begingroup$
    David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 19:34














5












5








5





$begingroup$

Alternatively, consider four-storey building with $8,4,4,8$ points labeled $1$ through $24$:



$hspace{3cm}$enter image description here



First floor: Number $1$ can connect with none on the first floor. $1$ can connect with ${11,12}$ on the second floor, with ${15,16}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22,23,24}$ on the fourth floor. So, $1$ can connect with $2+2+6=10$ points, so does each of $2-8$, hence: $8cdot 10=color{red}{80}$.



Second floor: Number $9$ can connect with none on the first floor. $9$ can connect with ${11}$ on the second floor, so does $10$ with $12$. Hence: $color{red}{2}$ connections on the second floor only. $9$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $9$ can connect with $1+4=5$ points on the third and fourth floors, so does each each of ${10,11,12}$, hence: $4cdot 5=color{red}{20}$. Overall, $color{red}{22}$ connections.



Third floor: $13$ can connect with none on the first or second floor. $13$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor, so does $14$ with $16$, hence $color{red}{2}$ connections on the third floor only. $13$ can connect with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $13$ can connect with $4$ points on the fourth floor, so does each of ${14,15,16}$, hence: $4cdot 4=color{red}{16}$. Overall, $color{red}{18}$ connections.



Fourth floor: $17$ can connect with none on the first, second, third or fourth floor. So does each other on the fourth floor.



Hence, the number of inner connections is: $color{red}{80}+color{red}{22}+color{red}{18}=120$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Alternatively, consider four-storey building with $8,4,4,8$ points labeled $1$ through $24$:



$hspace{3cm}$enter image description here



First floor: Number $1$ can connect with none on the first floor. $1$ can connect with ${11,12}$ on the second floor, with ${15,16}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22,23,24}$ on the fourth floor. So, $1$ can connect with $2+2+6=10$ points, so does each of $2-8$, hence: $8cdot 10=color{red}{80}$.



Second floor: Number $9$ can connect with none on the first floor. $9$ can connect with ${11}$ on the second floor, so does $10$ with $12$. Hence: $color{red}{2}$ connections on the second floor only. $9$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor and with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $9$ can connect with $1+4=5$ points on the third and fourth floors, so does each each of ${10,11,12}$, hence: $4cdot 5=color{red}{20}$. Overall, $color{red}{22}$ connections.



Third floor: $13$ can connect with none on the first or second floor. $13$ can connect with ${15}$ on the third floor, so does $14$ with $16$, hence $color{red}{2}$ connections on the third floor only. $13$ can connect with ${19,20,21,22}$ on the fourth floor. So, $13$ can connect with $4$ points on the fourth floor, so does each of ${14,15,16}$, hence: $4cdot 4=color{red}{16}$. Overall, $color{red}{18}$ connections.



Fourth floor: $17$ can connect with none on the first, second, third or fourth floor. So does each other on the fourth floor.



Hence, the number of inner connections is: $color{red}{80}+color{red}{22}+color{red}{18}=120$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 14 at 16:36

























answered Mar 14 at 16:20









farruhotafarruhota

21.5k2842




21.5k2842








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    something is missing, let me double check
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    now it is fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
    $endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 14 at 19:10










  • $begingroup$
    David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 19:34














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    something is missing, let me double check
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    now it is fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 16:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
    $endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 14 at 19:10










  • $begingroup$
    David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Mar 14 at 19:34








1




1




$begingroup$
something is missing, let me double check
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 14 at 16:24




$begingroup$
something is missing, let me double check
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 14 at 16:24












$begingroup$
now it is fixed.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 14 at 16:36




$begingroup$
now it is fixed.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 14 at 16:36




1




1




$begingroup$
Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
$endgroup$
– David Z
Mar 14 at 19:10




$begingroup$
Another way of looking at it: since the symmetry group of the truncated cube lets you rotate any vertex on to any other vertex, once you count how many connections a single one can make (10), you can multiply that by 24 to get the number of directed connections, then divide by two because that figure counts each connection twice (once in each direction), and you get the same answer of 120. I don't know if this would be independent enough to make a good separate answer.
$endgroup$
– David Z
Mar 14 at 19:10












$begingroup$
David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 14 at 19:34




$begingroup$
David Z, I assume that is what Parcly Taxel did after finding the number of inner connections. I just wanted to see through all inner connections from different perspectives. Cheers.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 14 at 19:34











14












$begingroup$

In the resulting truncated cube, each vertex $v$ is incident to one triangle and two octagons, which together have $3+8+8-3-3=13$ vertices between them excluding $v$. Lines from $v$ to these $13$ vertices will not be completely in the cube; lines to the other $24-13-1=10$ vertices will. Since each connecting line is incident to two vertices, there are $frac{24cdot10}2=120$ interior lines.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
    $endgroup$
    – antkam
    Mar 14 at 18:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 14 at 18:31












  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 15 at 1:02
















14












$begingroup$

In the resulting truncated cube, each vertex $v$ is incident to one triangle and two octagons, which together have $3+8+8-3-3=13$ vertices between them excluding $v$. Lines from $v$ to these $13$ vertices will not be completely in the cube; lines to the other $24-13-1=10$ vertices will. Since each connecting line is incident to two vertices, there are $frac{24cdot10}2=120$ interior lines.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
    $endgroup$
    – antkam
    Mar 14 at 18:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 14 at 18:31












  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 15 at 1:02














14












14








14





$begingroup$

In the resulting truncated cube, each vertex $v$ is incident to one triangle and two octagons, which together have $3+8+8-3-3=13$ vertices between them excluding $v$. Lines from $v$ to these $13$ vertices will not be completely in the cube; lines to the other $24-13-1=10$ vertices will. Since each connecting line is incident to two vertices, there are $frac{24cdot10}2=120$ interior lines.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



In the resulting truncated cube, each vertex $v$ is incident to one triangle and two octagons, which together have $3+8+8-3-3=13$ vertices between them excluding $v$. Lines from $v$ to these $13$ vertices will not be completely in the cube; lines to the other $24-13-1=10$ vertices will. Since each connecting line is incident to two vertices, there are $frac{24cdot10}2=120$ interior lines.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 15 at 1:02

























answered Mar 14 at 13:42









Parcly TaxelParcly Taxel

44.7k1376110




44.7k1376110












  • $begingroup$
    +1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
    $endgroup$
    – antkam
    Mar 14 at 18:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 14 at 18:31












  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 15 at 1:02


















  • $begingroup$
    +1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
    $endgroup$
    – antkam
    Mar 14 at 18:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 14 at 18:31












  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 15 at 1:02
















$begingroup$
+1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
$endgroup$
– antkam
Mar 14 at 18:21




$begingroup$
+1 IMHO the most natural answer (also quickest, also least prone to counting error) since every vertex is the same.
$endgroup$
– antkam
Mar 14 at 18:21




1




1




$begingroup$
One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 14 at 18:31






$begingroup$
One triangle and two octagons. Given this mistake, can you please explain your $3+8+8-3-3$? It gets the right answer, but it looks like sheer luck...
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 14 at 18:31














$begingroup$
@TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Mar 15 at 1:02




$begingroup$
@TonyK It's a typo, that's all!
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Mar 15 at 1:02











7












$begingroup$

Every one of them that does not run along a face.



Each octahedral face of the object, of which there are $6,$ contains $8$ vertices, so there are $6{8 choose 2}=168$ segments along those faces. The segments that are part of the $12$ original edges of the cube are counted twice, so we subtract $12$, leaving $156$ segments on the octagonal faces of the object.



The triangular faces have segments running along them, but we have already counted those because they also run along an octahedral face. There are ${24 choose 2}=276$ line segments, so there are $276-156=120$ running through the body of the object.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 14 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 14 at 13:45
















7












$begingroup$

Every one of them that does not run along a face.



Each octahedral face of the object, of which there are $6,$ contains $8$ vertices, so there are $6{8 choose 2}=168$ segments along those faces. The segments that are part of the $12$ original edges of the cube are counted twice, so we subtract $12$, leaving $156$ segments on the octagonal faces of the object.



The triangular faces have segments running along them, but we have already counted those because they also run along an octahedral face. There are ${24 choose 2}=276$ line segments, so there are $276-156=120$ running through the body of the object.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 14 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 14 at 13:45














7












7








7





$begingroup$

Every one of them that does not run along a face.



Each octahedral face of the object, of which there are $6,$ contains $8$ vertices, so there are $6{8 choose 2}=168$ segments along those faces. The segments that are part of the $12$ original edges of the cube are counted twice, so we subtract $12$, leaving $156$ segments on the octagonal faces of the object.



The triangular faces have segments running along them, but we have already counted those because they also run along an octahedral face. There are ${24 choose 2}=276$ line segments, so there are $276-156=120$ running through the body of the object.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Every one of them that does not run along a face.



Each octahedral face of the object, of which there are $6,$ contains $8$ vertices, so there are $6{8 choose 2}=168$ segments along those faces. The segments that are part of the $12$ original edges of the cube are counted twice, so we subtract $12$, leaving $156$ segments on the octagonal faces of the object.



The triangular faces have segments running along them, but we have already counted those because they also run along an octahedral face. There are ${24 choose 2}=276$ line segments, so there are $276-156=120$ running through the body of the object.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 14 at 13:42

























answered Mar 14 at 13:40









Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

300k24200374




300k24200374












  • $begingroup$
    You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 14 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 14 at 13:45


















  • $begingroup$
    You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Mar 14 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Mar 14 at 13:45
















$begingroup$
You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Mar 14 at 13:42




$begingroup$
You're double-counting octagon-octagon edges.
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Mar 14 at 13:42












$begingroup$
@ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 14 at 13:45




$begingroup$
@ParclyTaxel: Good point. Fixed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 14 at 13:45



Popular posts from this blog

Fairchild Swearingen Metro Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Innenausstattung | Nutzung | Zwischenfälle...

Pilgersdorf Inhaltsverzeichnis Geografie | Geschichte | Bevölkerungsentwicklung | Politik | Kultur...

Marineschifffahrtleitung Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Heutige Organisation der NATO | Nationale und...