How can I print a 3840 x 2160 pixel image on 4″×6″?Is there any post processing required for printing...
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Prove the support of a real function is countable
Eww, those bytes are gross
Jumping Numbers
Slow moving projectiles from a hand-held weapon - how do they reach the target?
Checking for the existence of multiple directories
What does Cypher mean when he says Neo is "gonna pop"?
What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?
Cryptic with missing capitals
A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?
Placing an adverb between a verb and an object?
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
What's the meaning of "mellow mama"?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
GeoGebra-like segment marks
Is there a better way to make this?
What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?
Can I write a book of my D&D game?
Using loops to create tables
Luggage storage for 10 day in Tokyo
How to acknowledge an embarrassing job interview, now that I work directly with the interviewer?
Can you earn endless XP using a Flameskull and its self-revival feature?
dirname appears not to work with xargs
Quenching swords in dragon blood; why?
How can I print a 3840 x 2160 pixel image on 4″×6″?
Is there any post processing required for printing images?Is there a way to have Lightroom include the cropped aspect ratio in the filename when the file is exported?Lightroom: Print Module or Develop/Export for online printing in specific aspect ratios?How can one image be printed in multiple sizes without losing content?How to respect the dimensions when we reduce the images?How do I print in a wide aspect ratio?Why printing on 10x15cm paper always cropped?Why are 2:3 standard frame sizes not exactly 2:3?Help with making a large print - 60 x 36 - will my photo work?Cropping vs. resizing: which is better/more acceptable?
On a family vacation I took pictures with my Xperia Z4 that gives image sizes of 3840 pixels × 2160 pixels.
I would now like to print all photos with image size 102mm × 152mm (4″ × 6″)
What do I need to do to do this? I tried an online printing service but the resulting images are either trimmed or have whitespace around the top/bottom edges. If I try resizing, then the aspect ratio is lost and the image looks stretched.
Is there a way to print the images with a size of 102mm × 152mm (4" × 6") without losing the aspect ratio and edges being trimmed or having a whitespace?
printing aspect-ratio
New contributor
add a comment |
On a family vacation I took pictures with my Xperia Z4 that gives image sizes of 3840 pixels × 2160 pixels.
I would now like to print all photos with image size 102mm × 152mm (4″ × 6″)
What do I need to do to do this? I tried an online printing service but the resulting images are either trimmed or have whitespace around the top/bottom edges. If I try resizing, then the aspect ratio is lost and the image looks stretched.
Is there a way to print the images with a size of 102mm × 152mm (4" × 6") without losing the aspect ratio and edges being trimmed or having a whitespace?
printing aspect-ratio
New contributor
add a comment |
On a family vacation I took pictures with my Xperia Z4 that gives image sizes of 3840 pixels × 2160 pixels.
I would now like to print all photos with image size 102mm × 152mm (4″ × 6″)
What do I need to do to do this? I tried an online printing service but the resulting images are either trimmed or have whitespace around the top/bottom edges. If I try resizing, then the aspect ratio is lost and the image looks stretched.
Is there a way to print the images with a size of 102mm × 152mm (4" × 6") without losing the aspect ratio and edges being trimmed or having a whitespace?
printing aspect-ratio
New contributor
On a family vacation I took pictures with my Xperia Z4 that gives image sizes of 3840 pixels × 2160 pixels.
I would now like to print all photos with image size 102mm × 152mm (4″ × 6″)
What do I need to do to do this? I tried an online printing service but the resulting images are either trimmed or have whitespace around the top/bottom edges. If I try resizing, then the aspect ratio is lost and the image looks stretched.
Is there a way to print the images with a size of 102mm × 152mm (4" × 6") without losing the aspect ratio and edges being trimmed or having a whitespace?
printing aspect-ratio
printing aspect-ratio
New contributor
New contributor
edited 23 mins ago
mattdm
121k40356649
121k40356649
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
user82374user82374
112
112
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
3840 x 2160 px means an aspect ratio of 16:9 - it is the reduced fraction of the pixel values:
3840:2160 -> (:20) -> 192:108 -> (:6) -> 32:18 -> (:2) -> 16:9
Since your images have an aspect ratio of 16:9 and 6" x 4" prints have an aspect ratio of 3:2, something will have to give:
- Either you live with the white space,
- or something needs to be cropped away (so 3240 x 2160 px),
- or the aspect ratio will be adapted, thus stretching your images on the y-axis,
- or you print in 16:9, e.g. 4.5" x 8"
If you choose to crop them, there is a wide variety on both free and non-free programs to do this: Photoshop, GIMP (free), or virtually any other image tool (IrfanView (free), XnView (free), Lightroom, Capture One, Darktable (free), DigiKam (free), RawTherapee (free), ...) can do this. I would rather crop something away myself, as you have control over what exactly gets cut away (e.g. perhaps the left side is filled with a concrete wall, but on the right side are people you would not want to get trimmed away.)
If you decide that in the future, you want to capture the images in 3:2 to reduce post-production work, then you can change the aspect ratio in your camera app's settings (at least Open Camera, Google Camera and FV-5 can do this).
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
1
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Strange question...
You don't want to crop, you don't want borders, you don't want to stretch the image...but you want to somehow put one rectangle into another rectangle of a different aspect ratio.
What other options could there be?
It's like putting a round peg in a square hole. Well, a rectangular peg in a rectangular hole. This isn't specific to photography - it's just geometry and some logical thinking.
add a comment |
First, let's help you ask the question correctly. What you should ask from now on is:
Is the aspect ratio preserved between these two sizes?
The answer in this case is no and here I explain how you can answer this question yourself in the future:
Aspect ratio can be represented as a fraction or a decimal. In this instance, aspect ratio represented as a decimal is more useful to us. There is a simple rule you can follow in the future.
If the aspect ratio of the two sizes do not match, you will need either cropping, bars, stretching or distortion to make it fit. You can calculate Aspect Ratio by dividing the Width by the Height.
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
6/4 (Aspect Ratio: 1.5 ) ( 3/2 = 1.5 )
Not Possible because the Aspect Ratios do not match.
Here is an example of two different sizes where the aspect ratio is preserved which is what you want:
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
1920/1080 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
Possible because the Aspect Ratios match.
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm not aware of any online printing service which offers any print sizes with a 16×9 aspect ratio. That's a little odd because of how standard 16×9 has become because of the TV standard, but... there it is.
Assuming you don't want to crop, your only option is to print on larger paper with whitespace, and then trim that whitespace. I recommend a rotary paper trimmer — you can get a good one for less than $50. (To keep them cutting cleanly you will eventually need replacement blades, but, eh, good for that price for a while.)
Then, print on 4×6" and trim to 3⅜×6" (because 3.375 is ⁹⁄₁₆ths of 6). Or start with 5×7" and trim to ... just under 4 inches. (Or use the same idea on even larger prints, but price per print will go up significantly.)
One thing to be aware of: most print shops will actually trim something from the edges of the frame even when the aspect ratio matches. That's how the right-to-the-edge thing works without the shop needing to be super-precise. So, if your images are already composed and framed how you like and you want to avoid this, you need to print with whitespace and trim yourself anyway.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user82374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105543%2fhow-can-i-print-a-3840-x-2160-pixel-image-on-4-%25c3%25976%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
3840 x 2160 px means an aspect ratio of 16:9 - it is the reduced fraction of the pixel values:
3840:2160 -> (:20) -> 192:108 -> (:6) -> 32:18 -> (:2) -> 16:9
Since your images have an aspect ratio of 16:9 and 6" x 4" prints have an aspect ratio of 3:2, something will have to give:
- Either you live with the white space,
- or something needs to be cropped away (so 3240 x 2160 px),
- or the aspect ratio will be adapted, thus stretching your images on the y-axis,
- or you print in 16:9, e.g. 4.5" x 8"
If you choose to crop them, there is a wide variety on both free and non-free programs to do this: Photoshop, GIMP (free), or virtually any other image tool (IrfanView (free), XnView (free), Lightroom, Capture One, Darktable (free), DigiKam (free), RawTherapee (free), ...) can do this. I would rather crop something away myself, as you have control over what exactly gets cut away (e.g. perhaps the left side is filled with a concrete wall, but on the right side are people you would not want to get trimmed away.)
If you decide that in the future, you want to capture the images in 3:2 to reduce post-production work, then you can change the aspect ratio in your camera app's settings (at least Open Camera, Google Camera and FV-5 can do this).
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
1
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3840 x 2160 px means an aspect ratio of 16:9 - it is the reduced fraction of the pixel values:
3840:2160 -> (:20) -> 192:108 -> (:6) -> 32:18 -> (:2) -> 16:9
Since your images have an aspect ratio of 16:9 and 6" x 4" prints have an aspect ratio of 3:2, something will have to give:
- Either you live with the white space,
- or something needs to be cropped away (so 3240 x 2160 px),
- or the aspect ratio will be adapted, thus stretching your images on the y-axis,
- or you print in 16:9, e.g. 4.5" x 8"
If you choose to crop them, there is a wide variety on both free and non-free programs to do this: Photoshop, GIMP (free), or virtually any other image tool (IrfanView (free), XnView (free), Lightroom, Capture One, Darktable (free), DigiKam (free), RawTherapee (free), ...) can do this. I would rather crop something away myself, as you have control over what exactly gets cut away (e.g. perhaps the left side is filled with a concrete wall, but on the right side are people you would not want to get trimmed away.)
If you decide that in the future, you want to capture the images in 3:2 to reduce post-production work, then you can change the aspect ratio in your camera app's settings (at least Open Camera, Google Camera and FV-5 can do this).
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
1
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3840 x 2160 px means an aspect ratio of 16:9 - it is the reduced fraction of the pixel values:
3840:2160 -> (:20) -> 192:108 -> (:6) -> 32:18 -> (:2) -> 16:9
Since your images have an aspect ratio of 16:9 and 6" x 4" prints have an aspect ratio of 3:2, something will have to give:
- Either you live with the white space,
- or something needs to be cropped away (so 3240 x 2160 px),
- or the aspect ratio will be adapted, thus stretching your images on the y-axis,
- or you print in 16:9, e.g. 4.5" x 8"
If you choose to crop them, there is a wide variety on both free and non-free programs to do this: Photoshop, GIMP (free), or virtually any other image tool (IrfanView (free), XnView (free), Lightroom, Capture One, Darktable (free), DigiKam (free), RawTherapee (free), ...) can do this. I would rather crop something away myself, as you have control over what exactly gets cut away (e.g. perhaps the left side is filled with a concrete wall, but on the right side are people you would not want to get trimmed away.)
If you decide that in the future, you want to capture the images in 3:2 to reduce post-production work, then you can change the aspect ratio in your camera app's settings (at least Open Camera, Google Camera and FV-5 can do this).
3840 x 2160 px means an aspect ratio of 16:9 - it is the reduced fraction of the pixel values:
3840:2160 -> (:20) -> 192:108 -> (:6) -> 32:18 -> (:2) -> 16:9
Since your images have an aspect ratio of 16:9 and 6" x 4" prints have an aspect ratio of 3:2, something will have to give:
- Either you live with the white space,
- or something needs to be cropped away (so 3240 x 2160 px),
- or the aspect ratio will be adapted, thus stretching your images on the y-axis,
- or you print in 16:9, e.g. 4.5" x 8"
If you choose to crop them, there is a wide variety on both free and non-free programs to do this: Photoshop, GIMP (free), or virtually any other image tool (IrfanView (free), XnView (free), Lightroom, Capture One, Darktable (free), DigiKam (free), RawTherapee (free), ...) can do this. I would rather crop something away myself, as you have control over what exactly gets cut away (e.g. perhaps the left side is filled with a concrete wall, but on the right side are people you would not want to get trimmed away.)
If you decide that in the future, you want to capture the images in 3:2 to reduce post-production work, then you can change the aspect ratio in your camera app's settings (at least Open Camera, Google Camera and FV-5 can do this).
edited 3 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
floliloliloflolilolilo
4,66111633
4,66111633
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
1
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
1
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
A forth option is to print in 16:9
– lijat
5 hours ago
1
1
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
How do I print in 16:9? Does that mean choosing a different print size? If so, what print size corresponds to it?
– user82374
5 hours ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
@user82374 what are you trying to do? Ultimately. Is this something to do with framing? Or what?
– osullic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Strange question...
You don't want to crop, you don't want borders, you don't want to stretch the image...but you want to somehow put one rectangle into another rectangle of a different aspect ratio.
What other options could there be?
It's like putting a round peg in a square hole. Well, a rectangular peg in a rectangular hole. This isn't specific to photography - it's just geometry and some logical thinking.
add a comment |
Strange question...
You don't want to crop, you don't want borders, you don't want to stretch the image...but you want to somehow put one rectangle into another rectangle of a different aspect ratio.
What other options could there be?
It's like putting a round peg in a square hole. Well, a rectangular peg in a rectangular hole. This isn't specific to photography - it's just geometry and some logical thinking.
add a comment |
Strange question...
You don't want to crop, you don't want borders, you don't want to stretch the image...but you want to somehow put one rectangle into another rectangle of a different aspect ratio.
What other options could there be?
It's like putting a round peg in a square hole. Well, a rectangular peg in a rectangular hole. This isn't specific to photography - it's just geometry and some logical thinking.
Strange question...
You don't want to crop, you don't want borders, you don't want to stretch the image...but you want to somehow put one rectangle into another rectangle of a different aspect ratio.
What other options could there be?
It's like putting a round peg in a square hole. Well, a rectangular peg in a rectangular hole. This isn't specific to photography - it's just geometry and some logical thinking.
answered 1 hour ago
osullicosullic
6,01911026
6,01911026
add a comment |
add a comment |
First, let's help you ask the question correctly. What you should ask from now on is:
Is the aspect ratio preserved between these two sizes?
The answer in this case is no and here I explain how you can answer this question yourself in the future:
Aspect ratio can be represented as a fraction or a decimal. In this instance, aspect ratio represented as a decimal is more useful to us. There is a simple rule you can follow in the future.
If the aspect ratio of the two sizes do not match, you will need either cropping, bars, stretching or distortion to make it fit. You can calculate Aspect Ratio by dividing the Width by the Height.
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
6/4 (Aspect Ratio: 1.5 ) ( 3/2 = 1.5 )
Not Possible because the Aspect Ratios do not match.
Here is an example of two different sizes where the aspect ratio is preserved which is what you want:
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
1920/1080 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
Possible because the Aspect Ratios match.
New contributor
add a comment |
First, let's help you ask the question correctly. What you should ask from now on is:
Is the aspect ratio preserved between these two sizes?
The answer in this case is no and here I explain how you can answer this question yourself in the future:
Aspect ratio can be represented as a fraction or a decimal. In this instance, aspect ratio represented as a decimal is more useful to us. There is a simple rule you can follow in the future.
If the aspect ratio of the two sizes do not match, you will need either cropping, bars, stretching or distortion to make it fit. You can calculate Aspect Ratio by dividing the Width by the Height.
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
6/4 (Aspect Ratio: 1.5 ) ( 3/2 = 1.5 )
Not Possible because the Aspect Ratios do not match.
Here is an example of two different sizes where the aspect ratio is preserved which is what you want:
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
1920/1080 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
Possible because the Aspect Ratios match.
New contributor
add a comment |
First, let's help you ask the question correctly. What you should ask from now on is:
Is the aspect ratio preserved between these two sizes?
The answer in this case is no and here I explain how you can answer this question yourself in the future:
Aspect ratio can be represented as a fraction or a decimal. In this instance, aspect ratio represented as a decimal is more useful to us. There is a simple rule you can follow in the future.
If the aspect ratio of the two sizes do not match, you will need either cropping, bars, stretching or distortion to make it fit. You can calculate Aspect Ratio by dividing the Width by the Height.
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
6/4 (Aspect Ratio: 1.5 ) ( 3/2 = 1.5 )
Not Possible because the Aspect Ratios do not match.
Here is an example of two different sizes where the aspect ratio is preserved which is what you want:
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
1920/1080 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
Possible because the Aspect Ratios match.
New contributor
First, let's help you ask the question correctly. What you should ask from now on is:
Is the aspect ratio preserved between these two sizes?
The answer in this case is no and here I explain how you can answer this question yourself in the future:
Aspect ratio can be represented as a fraction or a decimal. In this instance, aspect ratio represented as a decimal is more useful to us. There is a simple rule you can follow in the future.
If the aspect ratio of the two sizes do not match, you will need either cropping, bars, stretching or distortion to make it fit. You can calculate Aspect Ratio by dividing the Width by the Height.
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
6/4 (Aspect Ratio: 1.5 ) ( 3/2 = 1.5 )
Not Possible because the Aspect Ratios do not match.
Here is an example of two different sizes where the aspect ratio is preserved which is what you want:
3840/2160 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
1920/1080 (Aspect Ratio: 1.778) (16/9 = 1.778)
Possible because the Aspect Ratios match.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 18 mins ago
Robert TaladaRobert Talada
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'm not aware of any online printing service which offers any print sizes with a 16×9 aspect ratio. That's a little odd because of how standard 16×9 has become because of the TV standard, but... there it is.
Assuming you don't want to crop, your only option is to print on larger paper with whitespace, and then trim that whitespace. I recommend a rotary paper trimmer — you can get a good one for less than $50. (To keep them cutting cleanly you will eventually need replacement blades, but, eh, good for that price for a while.)
Then, print on 4×6" and trim to 3⅜×6" (because 3.375 is ⁹⁄₁₆ths of 6). Or start with 5×7" and trim to ... just under 4 inches. (Or use the same idea on even larger prints, but price per print will go up significantly.)
One thing to be aware of: most print shops will actually trim something from the edges of the frame even when the aspect ratio matches. That's how the right-to-the-edge thing works without the shop needing to be super-precise. So, if your images are already composed and framed how you like and you want to avoid this, you need to print with whitespace and trim yourself anyway.
add a comment |
I'm not aware of any online printing service which offers any print sizes with a 16×9 aspect ratio. That's a little odd because of how standard 16×9 has become because of the TV standard, but... there it is.
Assuming you don't want to crop, your only option is to print on larger paper with whitespace, and then trim that whitespace. I recommend a rotary paper trimmer — you can get a good one for less than $50. (To keep them cutting cleanly you will eventually need replacement blades, but, eh, good for that price for a while.)
Then, print on 4×6" and trim to 3⅜×6" (because 3.375 is ⁹⁄₁₆ths of 6). Or start with 5×7" and trim to ... just under 4 inches. (Or use the same idea on even larger prints, but price per print will go up significantly.)
One thing to be aware of: most print shops will actually trim something from the edges of the frame even when the aspect ratio matches. That's how the right-to-the-edge thing works without the shop needing to be super-precise. So, if your images are already composed and framed how you like and you want to avoid this, you need to print with whitespace and trim yourself anyway.
add a comment |
I'm not aware of any online printing service which offers any print sizes with a 16×9 aspect ratio. That's a little odd because of how standard 16×9 has become because of the TV standard, but... there it is.
Assuming you don't want to crop, your only option is to print on larger paper with whitespace, and then trim that whitespace. I recommend a rotary paper trimmer — you can get a good one for less than $50. (To keep them cutting cleanly you will eventually need replacement blades, but, eh, good for that price for a while.)
Then, print on 4×6" and trim to 3⅜×6" (because 3.375 is ⁹⁄₁₆ths of 6). Or start with 5×7" and trim to ... just under 4 inches. (Or use the same idea on even larger prints, but price per print will go up significantly.)
One thing to be aware of: most print shops will actually trim something from the edges of the frame even when the aspect ratio matches. That's how the right-to-the-edge thing works without the shop needing to be super-precise. So, if your images are already composed and framed how you like and you want to avoid this, you need to print with whitespace and trim yourself anyway.
I'm not aware of any online printing service which offers any print sizes with a 16×9 aspect ratio. That's a little odd because of how standard 16×9 has become because of the TV standard, but... there it is.
Assuming you don't want to crop, your only option is to print on larger paper with whitespace, and then trim that whitespace. I recommend a rotary paper trimmer — you can get a good one for less than $50. (To keep them cutting cleanly you will eventually need replacement blades, but, eh, good for that price for a while.)
Then, print on 4×6" and trim to 3⅜×6" (because 3.375 is ⁹⁄₁₆ths of 6). Or start with 5×7" and trim to ... just under 4 inches. (Or use the same idea on even larger prints, but price per print will go up significantly.)
One thing to be aware of: most print shops will actually trim something from the edges of the frame even when the aspect ratio matches. That's how the right-to-the-edge thing works without the shop needing to be super-precise. So, if your images are already composed and framed how you like and you want to avoid this, you need to print with whitespace and trim yourself anyway.
answered 7 mins ago
mattdmmattdm
121k40356649
121k40356649
add a comment |
add a comment |
user82374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user82374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user82374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user82374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105543%2fhow-can-i-print-a-3840-x-2160-pixel-image-on-4-%25c3%25976%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown