Is the gradient of the self-intersections of a curve zero? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer...

Can I write a for loop that iterates over both collections and arrays?

I see my dog run

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

Carnot-Caratheodory metric

What is this 4-propeller plane?

How to reverse every other sublist of a list?

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

Is bread bad for ducks?

How to manage monthly salary

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Geography at the pixel level

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

It's possible to achieve negative score?

Output the Arecibo Message

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

Can we apply L'Hospital's rule where the derivative is not continuous?

Evaluating number of iteration with a certain map with While



Is the gradient of the self-intersections of a curve zero?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMonotonic curvature and self intersections.Parallel translation along a self intersecting curveSelf adjoint total covariant derivativeStokes Theorem for Manifolds with Self-IntersectionsIntersections of two curves in $mathbb{R}^n$Self intersections of a smooth closed curve being deformedProving that strictly monotonic curvature implies no self intersections (more specifically, using the following inequalities)Does an immersed curve in general position has finite self-intersections?Can we describe Injective and non-Injective functions through intersections?Problem understanding the gradient of a field.












2












$begingroup$


Suppose a curve with self-intersections can be described by $phi(x,y)=0$. Suppose the intersections are $T_i$, $i=1,2,...$ and the gradient $nabla phi$ at those intersections are well defined. Then is it true that $nablaphi(T_i)=0$ for all $i$? In other words, are the gradients at those intersections all zero?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose a curve with self-intersections can be described by $phi(x,y)=0$. Suppose the intersections are $T_i$, $i=1,2,...$ and the gradient $nabla phi$ at those intersections are well defined. Then is it true that $nablaphi(T_i)=0$ for all $i$? In other words, are the gradients at those intersections all zero?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Suppose a curve with self-intersections can be described by $phi(x,y)=0$. Suppose the intersections are $T_i$, $i=1,2,...$ and the gradient $nabla phi$ at those intersections are well defined. Then is it true that $nablaphi(T_i)=0$ for all $i$? In other words, are the gradients at those intersections all zero?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose a curve with self-intersections can be described by $phi(x,y)=0$. Suppose the intersections are $T_i$, $i=1,2,...$ and the gradient $nabla phi$ at those intersections are well defined. Then is it true that $nablaphi(T_i)=0$ for all $i$? In other words, are the gradients at those intersections all zero?







      real-analysis calculus geometry differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Ernie060

      2,940719




      2,940719










      asked 8 hours ago









      winstonwinston

      537418




      537418






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Assuming $phi(x,y)$ is continuously differentiable in a neighbourhood of $T_i$, yes, because otherwise you could use the Implicit Function Theorem to get a unique curve in a neighourhood of $T_i$ satisfying $phi(x,y) = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            If we agree that $phi$ is continuously differentiable (so $nabla phi(x,y)$ is a continuous function of $x$ and $y$), then yes, this must be true.



            The reason is that, if $nabla phi(x_0, y_0) neq 0$ for some $(x_0, y_0)$, then the implicit function theorem guarantees that (locally) we can write $y$ as a function of $x$ or $x$ as a function of $y$. However, at a self-intersection $T_i$, our curve fails the horizontal and vertical line tests, so we cannot express $x$ as a function of $y$ or $y$ as a function of $x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181199%2fis-the-gradient-of-the-self-intersections-of-a-curve-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              Assuming $phi(x,y)$ is continuously differentiable in a neighbourhood of $T_i$, yes, because otherwise you could use the Implicit Function Theorem to get a unique curve in a neighourhood of $T_i$ satisfying $phi(x,y) = 0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                5












                $begingroup$

                Assuming $phi(x,y)$ is continuously differentiable in a neighbourhood of $T_i$, yes, because otherwise you could use the Implicit Function Theorem to get a unique curve in a neighourhood of $T_i$ satisfying $phi(x,y) = 0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  Assuming $phi(x,y)$ is continuously differentiable in a neighbourhood of $T_i$, yes, because otherwise you could use the Implicit Function Theorem to get a unique curve in a neighourhood of $T_i$ satisfying $phi(x,y) = 0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Assuming $phi(x,y)$ is continuously differentiable in a neighbourhood of $T_i$, yes, because otherwise you could use the Implicit Function Theorem to get a unique curve in a neighourhood of $T_i$ satisfying $phi(x,y) = 0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 7 hours ago









                  Robert IsraelRobert Israel

                  331k23220475




                  331k23220475























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      If we agree that $phi$ is continuously differentiable (so $nabla phi(x,y)$ is a continuous function of $x$ and $y$), then yes, this must be true.



                      The reason is that, if $nabla phi(x_0, y_0) neq 0$ for some $(x_0, y_0)$, then the implicit function theorem guarantees that (locally) we can write $y$ as a function of $x$ or $x$ as a function of $y$. However, at a self-intersection $T_i$, our curve fails the horizontal and vertical line tests, so we cannot express $x$ as a function of $y$ or $y$ as a function of $x$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        If we agree that $phi$ is continuously differentiable (so $nabla phi(x,y)$ is a continuous function of $x$ and $y$), then yes, this must be true.



                        The reason is that, if $nabla phi(x_0, y_0) neq 0$ for some $(x_0, y_0)$, then the implicit function theorem guarantees that (locally) we can write $y$ as a function of $x$ or $x$ as a function of $y$. However, at a self-intersection $T_i$, our curve fails the horizontal and vertical line tests, so we cannot express $x$ as a function of $y$ or $y$ as a function of $x$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          If we agree that $phi$ is continuously differentiable (so $nabla phi(x,y)$ is a continuous function of $x$ and $y$), then yes, this must be true.



                          The reason is that, if $nabla phi(x_0, y_0) neq 0$ for some $(x_0, y_0)$, then the implicit function theorem guarantees that (locally) we can write $y$ as a function of $x$ or $x$ as a function of $y$. However, at a self-intersection $T_i$, our curve fails the horizontal and vertical line tests, so we cannot express $x$ as a function of $y$ or $y$ as a function of $x$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          If we agree that $phi$ is continuously differentiable (so $nabla phi(x,y)$ is a continuous function of $x$ and $y$), then yes, this must be true.



                          The reason is that, if $nabla phi(x_0, y_0) neq 0$ for some $(x_0, y_0)$, then the implicit function theorem guarantees that (locally) we can write $y$ as a function of $x$ or $x$ as a function of $y$. However, at a self-intersection $T_i$, our curve fails the horizontal and vertical line tests, so we cannot express $x$ as a function of $y$ or $y$ as a function of $x$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 7 hours ago









                          StrantsStrants

                          5,84921736




                          5,84921736






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181199%2fis-the-gradient-of-the-self-intersections-of-a-curve-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Webac Holding Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Organisationsstruktur | Tochterfirmen |...

                              What's the meaning of a knight fighting a snail in medieval book illustrations?What is the meaning of a glove...

                              Salamanca Inhaltsverzeichnis Lage und Klima | Bevölkerungsentwicklung | Geschichte | Kultur und...