Can I dynamically generate unit testsCan these unit tests be improved?Structuring unit testsUnit Testing - A...
ER diagram relationship node size adjustment
Dynamic Linkage of LocatorPane and InputField
How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?
Outlet with 3 sets of wires
Would an aboleth's Phantasmal Force lair action be affected by Counterspell, Dispel Magic, and/or Slow?
Street obstacles in New Zealand
Getting the || sign while using Kurier
How do spaceships determine each other's mass in space?
Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?
Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?
How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?
What sort of fish is this
PTIJ: Why does only a Shor Tam ask at the Seder, and not a Shor Mu'ad?
NASA's RS-25 Engines
School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?
From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?
Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding
Should I take out a loan for a friend to invest on my behalf?
Finitely many repeated replacements
Having the player face themselves after the mid-game
What will happen if my luggage gets delayed?
In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt ice?
Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?
QQ Plot and Shapiro Wilk Test Disagree
Can I dynamically generate unit tests
Can these unit tests be improved?Structuring unit testsUnit Testing - A Better SolutionUnit testing annotation processors in JavaTesting with multiple input datasets and expectationsCorrect way to cover dependencies in unit testsA reference source for primes up to 64K (for unit tests)Testing procedure with several nested yield statements in Unity3DBattleShip Grid: Classes and TestsUnit testing a generic interface: proposal to avoid test duplication for different generic types
$begingroup$
kind of new to .NET and I'm trying to figure out if there's a better way for me to create my tests.
I'm writing an API that returns an object and I need to test that the return values match the expected results. Looks like this essentially:
Test files using partial to spread each input/result into it's own file:
public static partial class MyTests {
public static object Test1 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test2 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test3 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
}
Test class:
public class ServiceTests {
private ServiceRequest _request;
private ServiceResult _expectedResults;
private ServiceResult _response;
private ServiceCalc _service;
private const int DecimalPrecision = 4;
public void Setup(dynamic sampleData)
{
_request = sampleData.inputs;
_expectedResults = sampleData.results;
_service = new ServiceCalc(_request, Samples.Service.GetParams());
_response = _service.DoCalc();
}
public void EqualTest(decimal expected, decimal response)
{
Assert.AreEqual(
decimal.Round(expected, DecimalPrecision),
decimal.Round(response, DecimalPrecision)
);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
}
Initially I wanted to put the assets in the same function and I would only have one test for each value with multiple assets for each test scenario but my senior wanted to be able to tell exactly which test scenario failed but I'm finding it pretty tedious to write out these test methods every time we want to create a new test scenario.
What is a better approach?
c# .net unit-testing
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
kind of new to .NET and I'm trying to figure out if there's a better way for me to create my tests.
I'm writing an API that returns an object and I need to test that the return values match the expected results. Looks like this essentially:
Test files using partial to spread each input/result into it's own file:
public static partial class MyTests {
public static object Test1 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test2 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test3 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
}
Test class:
public class ServiceTests {
private ServiceRequest _request;
private ServiceResult _expectedResults;
private ServiceResult _response;
private ServiceCalc _service;
private const int DecimalPrecision = 4;
public void Setup(dynamic sampleData)
{
_request = sampleData.inputs;
_expectedResults = sampleData.results;
_service = new ServiceCalc(_request, Samples.Service.GetParams());
_response = _service.DoCalc();
}
public void EqualTest(decimal expected, decimal response)
{
Assert.AreEqual(
decimal.Round(expected, DecimalPrecision),
decimal.Round(response, DecimalPrecision)
);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
}
Initially I wanted to put the assets in the same function and I would only have one test for each value with multiple assets for each test scenario but my senior wanted to be able to tell exactly which test scenario failed but I'm finding it pretty tedious to write out these test methods every time we want to create a new test scenario.
What is a better approach?
c# .net unit-testing
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
kind of new to .NET and I'm trying to figure out if there's a better way for me to create my tests.
I'm writing an API that returns an object and I need to test that the return values match the expected results. Looks like this essentially:
Test files using partial to spread each input/result into it's own file:
public static partial class MyTests {
public static object Test1 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test2 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test3 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
}
Test class:
public class ServiceTests {
private ServiceRequest _request;
private ServiceResult _expectedResults;
private ServiceResult _response;
private ServiceCalc _service;
private const int DecimalPrecision = 4;
public void Setup(dynamic sampleData)
{
_request = sampleData.inputs;
_expectedResults = sampleData.results;
_service = new ServiceCalc(_request, Samples.Service.GetParams());
_response = _service.DoCalc();
}
public void EqualTest(decimal expected, decimal response)
{
Assert.AreEqual(
decimal.Round(expected, DecimalPrecision),
decimal.Round(response, DecimalPrecision)
);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
}
Initially I wanted to put the assets in the same function and I would only have one test for each value with multiple assets for each test scenario but my senior wanted to be able to tell exactly which test scenario failed but I'm finding it pretty tedious to write out these test methods every time we want to create a new test scenario.
What is a better approach?
c# .net unit-testing
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
$endgroup$
kind of new to .NET and I'm trying to figure out if there's a better way for me to create my tests.
I'm writing an API that returns an object and I need to test that the return values match the expected results. Looks like this essentially:
Test files using partial to spread each input/result into it's own file:
public static partial class MyTests {
public static object Test1 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test2 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
public static object Test3 {
inputs: new Inputs {...},
results: new Results {
value1 = 100,
value2 = 100,
value3 = 100,
}
},
}
Test class:
public class ServiceTests {
private ServiceRequest _request;
private ServiceResult _expectedResults;
private ServiceResult _response;
private ServiceCalc _service;
private const int DecimalPrecision = 4;
public void Setup(dynamic sampleData)
{
_request = sampleData.inputs;
_expectedResults = sampleData.results;
_service = new ServiceCalc(_request, Samples.Service.GetParams());
_response = _service.DoCalc();
}
public void EqualTest(decimal expected, decimal response)
{
Assert.AreEqual(
decimal.Round(expected, DecimalPrecision),
decimal.Round(response, DecimalPrecision)
);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value1_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value1, _response.value1);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value2_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value2, _response.value2);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_1()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test1);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_2()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test2);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
[TestMethod]
public void Value3_3()
{
Setup(Samples.Service.Test3);
EqualTest(_expectedResults.value3, _response.value3);
}
}
Initially I wanted to put the assets in the same function and I would only have one test for each value with multiple assets for each test scenario but my senior wanted to be able to tell exactly which test scenario failed but I'm finding it pretty tedious to write out these test methods every time we want to create a new test scenario.
What is a better approach?
c# .net unit-testing
c# .net unit-testing
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
asked 6 mins ago
BatmanBatman
1134
1134
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215156%2fcan-i-dynamically-generate-unit-tests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215156%2fcan-i-dynamically-generate-unit-tests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
