Prodigo = pro + ago?What did 'prō' mean in 'prōrogō' ? What is its Semantic Field?Is there any connection...

Why is this code 6.5x slower with optimizations enabled?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Copenhagen passport control - US citizen

My colleague's body is amazing

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

Shell script can be run only with sh command

How is this relation reflexive?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

Draw simple lines in Inkscape

Copycat chess is back

Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag

How do I create uniquely male characters?

New order #4: World

Example of a relative pronoun

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Motorized valve interfering with button?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Infinite past with a beginning?



Prodigo = pro + ago?


What did 'prō' mean in 'prōrogō' ? What is its Semantic Field?Is there any connection between “ave” (as in Ave Cesar) and “aveo”?How did '-met' + 'ipse' + '-issimus' compound to mean <the same> (in *metipsimus)?Does the Latin nosco come from Greek?How do we end up with three vowels at the end of Περικλέους? (Greek)Are there other Latin words from the same PIE root as oculus?Where did the passive infinitive come from?Etymology of Ἀσκληπιός (Greek)Where does quire come from?What is the etymology of the word “anterior”?













6















According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?










share|improve this question





























    6















    According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?










    share|improve this question



























      6












      6








      6


      2






      According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?










      share|improve this question
















      According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?







      etymologia verbs prefix






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 14:16









      Joonas Ilmavirta

      49k1271287




      49k1271287










      asked Apr 1 at 8:34









      luchonacholuchonacho

      6,08051560




      6,08051560






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
          In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
          Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



          It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
          For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
          This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



          Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






          share|improve this answer































            9














            Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



            The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



            In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



            (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



            Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:




            • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

            • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

            • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

            • Otherwise, it became i


            You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



            And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



            Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

              – Joonas Ilmavirta
              Apr 1 at 15:36











            • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

              – Draconis
              Apr 1 at 16:06






            • 2





              @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

              – Draconis
              Apr 1 at 23:34






            • 2





              (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

              – Draconis
              Apr 1 at 23:35






            • 2





              I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

              – sumelic
              Apr 2 at 3:34














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "644"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9390%2fprodigo-pro-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            7














            Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
            In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
            Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



            It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
            For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
            This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



            Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






            share|improve this answer




























              7














              Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
              In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
              Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



              It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
              For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
              This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



              Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






              share|improve this answer


























                7












                7








                7







                Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
                In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
                Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



                It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
                For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
                This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



                Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






                share|improve this answer













                Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
                In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
                Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



                It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
                For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
                This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



                Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 1 at 14:21









                Joonas IlmavirtaJoonas Ilmavirta

                49k1271287




                49k1271287























                    9














                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:




                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i


                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:34






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:35






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      Apr 2 at 3:34


















                    9














                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:




                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i


                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:34






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:35






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      Apr 2 at 3:34
















                    9












                    9








                    9







                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:




                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i


                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:




                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i


                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 2 at 4:29

























                    answered Apr 1 at 15:28









                    DraconisDraconis

                    18.2k22474




                    18.2k22474













                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:34






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:35






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      Apr 2 at 3:34





















                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:34






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 23:35






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      Apr 2 at 3:34



















                    Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                    – Joonas Ilmavirta
                    Apr 1 at 15:36





                    Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                    – Joonas Ilmavirta
                    Apr 1 at 15:36













                    @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 16:06





                    @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 16:06




                    2




                    2





                    @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 23:34





                    @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 23:34




                    2




                    2





                    (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 23:35





                    (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 23:35




                    2




                    2





                    I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                    – sumelic
                    Apr 2 at 3:34







                    I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                    – sumelic
                    Apr 2 at 3:34




















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9390%2fprodigo-pro-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    is 'sed' thread safeWhat should someone know about using Python scripts in the shell?Nexenta bash script uses...

                    How do i solve the “ No module named 'mlxtend' ” issue on Jupyter?

                    Pilgersdorf Inhaltsverzeichnis Geografie | Geschichte | Bevölkerungsentwicklung | Politik | Kultur...