Time(n) Complexity of Fibonacci AlgorithmsFibonacci sequence implementationFour algorithms to find the Nth...
Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted
Should I join an office cleaning event for free?
Draw simple lines in Inkscape
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
I see my dog run
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?
The magic money tree problem
What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
Non-Jewish family in an Orthodox Jewish Wedding
Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?
What is the white spray-pattern residue inside these Falcon Heavy nozzles?
Can a German sentence have two subjects?
My colleague's body is amazing
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
Time(n) Complexity of Fibonacci Algorithms
Fibonacci sequence implementationFour algorithms to find the Nth Fibonacci numberTime complexity of anagram solutionImproving the time complexity of my back pack algorithmPython Tkinter Game - Treasure HuntWhat are the time and space complexity of this algorithm?Find the closest parametric values corresponding to a BSpline's control pointsLeet Code :: Merge Binary Tree :: Time ComplexityTime complexity of tape equilibirumTime complexity of Max counters
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
It is my first use of classes in Python. I wanted to create something useful and try some new things as I learn this cool language: strategy pattern, testing with nanoseconds precision, curve/poly fitting, and making a graphic presentation. The budget was 150 lines of code: 50 for five Fibonacci number calculations, 50 for testing and checking the results, 50 for presentation. PyCharm was my mentor and strict format enforcer: 22 blank lines. I made it in 149
lines and then added one comment line. Could be a better “curve fit” and “poly fit” string formulas, but it will force me to go over 150 lines.
Here is what this program does:
- Calculates Fibonacci numbers from 2 to 30 by five different methods. Tests if all methods produce the same results and keep the shortest runtime from 10 tries.
- Plots all best times in nanoseconds at four subplots: regular axes, log Y, zoom to 30000 nSec, and zoom+ to 3000 nSec.
- It uses curve_fit from scipy and polyfit from numpy to find the best parameters for math formulas describing the time complexity of these Fibonacci algorithms.
I was happy to see the recursion as (446 * 1.62 ** n) just after the first tests and bug fixing - that is a theoretical O(φ**n) or 1.6180339887…
Critique and suggestion on how to write a better code are welcome.
Should I put all import statement at the top?
Here is the code:
from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod
from cachetools import cached, TTLCache
class Fibonacci(metaclass=ABCMeta): # Abstract prototype ######################
def fibonacci(self, n):
if isinstance(n, int) and n >= 0:
return self._fibonacci(n) if n >= 2 else [0, 1][n]
raise ValueError
@abstractmethod
def _fibonacci(self, n):
pass
class FibonacciRecursion(Fibonacci): # 1. Classic and also naive computation ##
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciCacheTools(Fibonacci): # 2. The cache fixes bad algorithm choice
cache = TTLCache(maxsize=1500, ttl=3600)
@cached(cache)
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciAddition(Fibonacci): # 3. It is O(n), not O(2**n) as before ####
def _fibonacci(self, n):
f0, f1 = 0, 1
for _ in range(1, n):
f0, f1 = f1, f0 + f1
return f1
class FibonacciAdditionPlus(FibonacciAddition): # 4. Exploiting the test: O(1)
def __init__(self):
self._n = 2
self._f0 = 1
self._f1 = 1
def _fibonacci(self, n):
if n == self._n:
return self._f1
if n < self._n:
self.__init__()
for _ in range(self._n, n):
self._f0, self._f1 = self._f1, self._f0 + self._f1
self._n = n
return self._f1
class FibonacciFormula(Fibonacci): # 5. Formula of Binet, Moivre, and Bernoulli
# Exact integer until Fibonacci(71)
# Float error at Fibonacci(1475) OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
S5 = 5.0 ** 0.5 # Square root of 5
def _fibonacci(self, n):
phi = (1.0 + FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # φ Python speaks greek!
psi = (1.0 - FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # ψ PyCharm doesn't like it ;-(
return int((phi ** n - psi ** n) / FibonacciFormula.S5)
if __name__ == '__main__': # Testing ... ######################################
import platform
import time
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def func1(x, a, b): # function to fit exponential Fibonacci
return '%f * %f**x' % (a, np.exp(b)) if x is None else a*np.exp(b*x)
def func2(x, a, b, c): # function to fit with cubic curve
return '%f + %f*x + %f*x**2' % (a, b, c) if x is None else a+x*(b+c*x)
def first_test(fibonacci_max, repeat): # Collect times, curve fit, and plot
methods = [ # Function to test, color, poly fit, curve fit
[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1],
[FibonacciCacheTools(), 'orange', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAddition(), 'green', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAdditionPlus(), 'red', 1, func2],
[FibonacciFormula(), 'purple', 1, func2],
]
print('Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds')
n_max = fibonacci_max - 1 # we start from n=2 (0, 1 - the same time)
y = [[0 for _ in range(n_max)] for _ in methods]
for j in range(n_max): # Run tests and collect times in array y #######
n = j + 2
old = None
for i, method in enumerate(methods):
best = None
for k in range(repeat):
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
result = method[0].fibonacci(n)
stop = time.perf_counter_ns()
duration = stop - start
if best is None or duration < best:
best = duration
if old is None:
old = result
elif result != old:
print(
'Error: different results %d and %d for function %s'
' F(%d) in call # %d,' %
(old, result, method[0].fibonacci.__name__, n, k+1))
exit(1)
if i == 0:
print(n, ',', old, sep='', end='')
print(',', best, sep='', end='')
y[i][j] = best
print()
plt.figure(1) # Start plotting ########################################
plt.suptitle('Time(n) Complexity of Fibonacci Algorithms. n = 2,3,...,'
'%d,%d' % (n_max, fibonacci_max))
x = np.array([i + 2 for i in range(n_max)])
plt.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.3)
for i in range(4):
plt.subplot(221 + i)
for j, m in enumerate(methods):
s = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[j], 'tab:' + m[1], label=s)
plt.title(['time in nanoseconds', 'log(Time)', 'zoom', 'zoom+'][i])
plt.grid(True)
if i == 0:
plt.legend()
elif i == 1:
plt.semilogy()
else:
x_min, x_max, _, _ = plt.axis()
plt.axis([x_min, x_max, 0.0, 30000.0 if i == 2 else 3000.0])
for i, m in enumerate(methods): # Curve and poly fitting ##############
plt.figure(2 + i)
name = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[i], 'ko', label=name)
c, _ = curve_fit(m[3], x, y[i])
c_name = 'curve fit:' + m[3](None, *c)
plt.plot(x, m[3](x, *c), 'y-', label=c_name)
p = np.poly1d(np.polyfit(x, y[i], m[2]))
p_name = 'poly fit: ' + str(p)
plt.plot(x, p(x), m[1], label=p_name)
plt.legend()
print('%sn%sn%sn' % (name, c_name, p_name))
plt.show()
print('Python version :', platform.python_version())
print(' build :', platform.python_build())
print(' compiler :n', platform.python_compiler())
first_test(fibonacci_max=30, repeat=10)
The output:
$ python fibonacci.py
Python version : 3.7.3
build : ('v3.7.3:ef4ec6ed12', 'Mar 25 2019 16:52:21')
compiler :
Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.57)
Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds
2,1,1027,2598,731,526,874
3,2,1638,2516,769,523,956
4,3,2818,2470,806,532,904
5,5,4592,2413,840,526,902
6,8,7571,2531,936,562,955
7,13,12376,2490,909,538,999
8,21,20528,2588,972,551,973
9,34,33349,2628,1074,581,1037
10,55,60107,2782,1116,581,997
11,89,85465,2421,1056,534,939
12,144,137395,2429,1101,534,942
13,233,222623,2411,1136,539,955
14,377,360054,2476,1216,551,938
15,610,600066,2736,1332,563,1006
16,987,971239,2529,1323,541,937
17,1597,1575092,2479,1359,552,937
18,2584,2565900,2632,1464,563,962
19,4181,4071666,2583,1485,555,953
20,6765,6630634,2503,1481,532,914
21,10946,10843455,2527,1571,522,930
22,17711,18277770,2617,1646,548,952
23,28657,28838223,2620,1739,573,967
24,46368,47167582,2481,1713,543,932
25,75025,77326177,2481,1709,531,909
26,121393,126154837,2587,1799,546,944
27,196418,205083621,2527,1857,548,942
28,317811,329818895,2444,1822,531,952
29,514229,533409650,2493,1932,551,946
30,832040,866064386,2509,1967,553,947
Recursion
curve fit:448.753271 * 1.619991**x
poly fit: 2
1.751e+06 x - 4.225e+07 x + 1.829e+08
CacheTools
curve fit:2492.458456 + 7.778994*x + -0.252776*x**2
poly fit:
-0.3099 x + 2539
Addition
curve fit:636.162562 + 42.475661*x + 0.074421*x**2
poly fit:
44.86 x + 622.3
AdditionPlus
curve fit:528.372414 + 2.642894*x + -0.076063*x**2
poly fit:
0.2089 x + 542.5
Formula
curve fit:920.230213 + 5.076194*x + -0.163003*x**2
poly fit:
-0.1399 x + 950.5
Graphics:
python algorithm comparative-review complexity fibonacci-sequence
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is my first use of classes in Python. I wanted to create something useful and try some new things as I learn this cool language: strategy pattern, testing with nanoseconds precision, curve/poly fitting, and making a graphic presentation. The budget was 150 lines of code: 50 for five Fibonacci number calculations, 50 for testing and checking the results, 50 for presentation. PyCharm was my mentor and strict format enforcer: 22 blank lines. I made it in 149
lines and then added one comment line. Could be a better “curve fit” and “poly fit” string formulas, but it will force me to go over 150 lines.
Here is what this program does:
- Calculates Fibonacci numbers from 2 to 30 by five different methods. Tests if all methods produce the same results and keep the shortest runtime from 10 tries.
- Plots all best times in nanoseconds at four subplots: regular axes, log Y, zoom to 30000 nSec, and zoom+ to 3000 nSec.
- It uses curve_fit from scipy and polyfit from numpy to find the best parameters for math formulas describing the time complexity of these Fibonacci algorithms.
I was happy to see the recursion as (446 * 1.62 ** n) just after the first tests and bug fixing - that is a theoretical O(φ**n) or 1.6180339887…
Critique and suggestion on how to write a better code are welcome.
Should I put all import statement at the top?
Here is the code:
from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod
from cachetools import cached, TTLCache
class Fibonacci(metaclass=ABCMeta): # Abstract prototype ######################
def fibonacci(self, n):
if isinstance(n, int) and n >= 0:
return self._fibonacci(n) if n >= 2 else [0, 1][n]
raise ValueError
@abstractmethod
def _fibonacci(self, n):
pass
class FibonacciRecursion(Fibonacci): # 1. Classic and also naive computation ##
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciCacheTools(Fibonacci): # 2. The cache fixes bad algorithm choice
cache = TTLCache(maxsize=1500, ttl=3600)
@cached(cache)
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciAddition(Fibonacci): # 3. It is O(n), not O(2**n) as before ####
def _fibonacci(self, n):
f0, f1 = 0, 1
for _ in range(1, n):
f0, f1 = f1, f0 + f1
return f1
class FibonacciAdditionPlus(FibonacciAddition): # 4. Exploiting the test: O(1)
def __init__(self):
self._n = 2
self._f0 = 1
self._f1 = 1
def _fibonacci(self, n):
if n == self._n:
return self._f1
if n < self._n:
self.__init__()
for _ in range(self._n, n):
self._f0, self._f1 = self._f1, self._f0 + self._f1
self._n = n
return self._f1
class FibonacciFormula(Fibonacci): # 5. Formula of Binet, Moivre, and Bernoulli
# Exact integer until Fibonacci(71)
# Float error at Fibonacci(1475) OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
S5 = 5.0 ** 0.5 # Square root of 5
def _fibonacci(self, n):
phi = (1.0 + FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # φ Python speaks greek!
psi = (1.0 - FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # ψ PyCharm doesn't like it ;-(
return int((phi ** n - psi ** n) / FibonacciFormula.S5)
if __name__ == '__main__': # Testing ... ######################################
import platform
import time
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def func1(x, a, b): # function to fit exponential Fibonacci
return '%f * %f**x' % (a, np.exp(b)) if x is None else a*np.exp(b*x)
def func2(x, a, b, c): # function to fit with cubic curve
return '%f + %f*x + %f*x**2' % (a, b, c) if x is None else a+x*(b+c*x)
def first_test(fibonacci_max, repeat): # Collect times, curve fit, and plot
methods = [ # Function to test, color, poly fit, curve fit
[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1],
[FibonacciCacheTools(), 'orange', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAddition(), 'green', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAdditionPlus(), 'red', 1, func2],
[FibonacciFormula(), 'purple', 1, func2],
]
print('Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds')
n_max = fibonacci_max - 1 # we start from n=2 (0, 1 - the same time)
y = [[0 for _ in range(n_max)] for _ in methods]
for j in range(n_max): # Run tests and collect times in array y #######
n = j + 2
old = None
for i, method in enumerate(methods):
best = None
for k in range(repeat):
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
result = method[0].fibonacci(n)
stop = time.perf_counter_ns()
duration = stop - start
if best is None or duration < best:
best = duration
if old is None:
old = result
elif result != old:
print(
'Error: different results %d and %d for function %s'
' F(%d) in call # %d,' %
(old, result, method[0].fibonacci.__name__, n, k+1))
exit(1)
if i == 0:
print(n, ',', old, sep='', end='')
print(',', best, sep='', end='')
y[i][j] = best
print()
plt.figure(1) # Start plotting ########################################
plt.suptitle('Time(n) Complexity of Fibonacci Algorithms. n = 2,3,...,'
'%d,%d' % (n_max, fibonacci_max))
x = np.array([i + 2 for i in range(n_max)])
plt.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.3)
for i in range(4):
plt.subplot(221 + i)
for j, m in enumerate(methods):
s = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[j], 'tab:' + m[1], label=s)
plt.title(['time in nanoseconds', 'log(Time)', 'zoom', 'zoom+'][i])
plt.grid(True)
if i == 0:
plt.legend()
elif i == 1:
plt.semilogy()
else:
x_min, x_max, _, _ = plt.axis()
plt.axis([x_min, x_max, 0.0, 30000.0 if i == 2 else 3000.0])
for i, m in enumerate(methods): # Curve and poly fitting ##############
plt.figure(2 + i)
name = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[i], 'ko', label=name)
c, _ = curve_fit(m[3], x, y[i])
c_name = 'curve fit:' + m[3](None, *c)
plt.plot(x, m[3](x, *c), 'y-', label=c_name)
p = np.poly1d(np.polyfit(x, y[i], m[2]))
p_name = 'poly fit: ' + str(p)
plt.plot(x, p(x), m[1], label=p_name)
plt.legend()
print('%sn%sn%sn' % (name, c_name, p_name))
plt.show()
print('Python version :', platform.python_version())
print(' build :', platform.python_build())
print(' compiler :n', platform.python_compiler())
first_test(fibonacci_max=30, repeat=10)
The output:
$ python fibonacci.py
Python version : 3.7.3
build : ('v3.7.3:ef4ec6ed12', 'Mar 25 2019 16:52:21')
compiler :
Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.57)
Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds
2,1,1027,2598,731,526,874
3,2,1638,2516,769,523,956
4,3,2818,2470,806,532,904
5,5,4592,2413,840,526,902
6,8,7571,2531,936,562,955
7,13,12376,2490,909,538,999
8,21,20528,2588,972,551,973
9,34,33349,2628,1074,581,1037
10,55,60107,2782,1116,581,997
11,89,85465,2421,1056,534,939
12,144,137395,2429,1101,534,942
13,233,222623,2411,1136,539,955
14,377,360054,2476,1216,551,938
15,610,600066,2736,1332,563,1006
16,987,971239,2529,1323,541,937
17,1597,1575092,2479,1359,552,937
18,2584,2565900,2632,1464,563,962
19,4181,4071666,2583,1485,555,953
20,6765,6630634,2503,1481,532,914
21,10946,10843455,2527,1571,522,930
22,17711,18277770,2617,1646,548,952
23,28657,28838223,2620,1739,573,967
24,46368,47167582,2481,1713,543,932
25,75025,77326177,2481,1709,531,909
26,121393,126154837,2587,1799,546,944
27,196418,205083621,2527,1857,548,942
28,317811,329818895,2444,1822,531,952
29,514229,533409650,2493,1932,551,946
30,832040,866064386,2509,1967,553,947
Recursion
curve fit:448.753271 * 1.619991**x
poly fit: 2
1.751e+06 x - 4.225e+07 x + 1.829e+08
CacheTools
curve fit:2492.458456 + 7.778994*x + -0.252776*x**2
poly fit:
-0.3099 x + 2539
Addition
curve fit:636.162562 + 42.475661*x + 0.074421*x**2
poly fit:
44.86 x + 622.3
AdditionPlus
curve fit:528.372414 + 2.642894*x + -0.076063*x**2
poly fit:
0.2089 x + 542.5
Formula
curve fit:920.230213 + 5.076194*x + -0.163003*x**2
poly fit:
-0.1399 x + 950.5
Graphics:
python algorithm comparative-review complexity fibonacci-sequence
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Well done on presenting intent and constraints upfront. One thing nagging me: why not choose an argument range to try and push the limits of integer representations (somehow managing run time of the plain recursive approach (and checking for deviation of "the formula result")).
$endgroup$
– greybeard
Apr 2 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome and the comment. Actually, I did comment the line with "[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1]," and "elif result != old:" in order to push the limit and see what will happen next: they stay steady flat O(1) except Addition O(n). Also started to write another test program to see the error in "the formula result" and a possibility to compensate it: the absolute error starts almost as another Fibonacci from 72 with F(n-71) range, but the relative error has a linear grow from 2.0e-15 at F(72) to 4.4e-14 at F(1314).
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is my first use of classes in Python. I wanted to create something useful and try some new things as I learn this cool language: strategy pattern, testing with nanoseconds precision, curve/poly fitting, and making a graphic presentation. The budget was 150 lines of code: 50 for five Fibonacci number calculations, 50 for testing and checking the results, 50 for presentation. PyCharm was my mentor and strict format enforcer: 22 blank lines. I made it in 149
lines and then added one comment line. Could be a better “curve fit” and “poly fit” string formulas, but it will force me to go over 150 lines.
Here is what this program does:
- Calculates Fibonacci numbers from 2 to 30 by five different methods. Tests if all methods produce the same results and keep the shortest runtime from 10 tries.
- Plots all best times in nanoseconds at four subplots: regular axes, log Y, zoom to 30000 nSec, and zoom+ to 3000 nSec.
- It uses curve_fit from scipy and polyfit from numpy to find the best parameters for math formulas describing the time complexity of these Fibonacci algorithms.
I was happy to see the recursion as (446 * 1.62 ** n) just after the first tests and bug fixing - that is a theoretical O(φ**n) or 1.6180339887…
Critique and suggestion on how to write a better code are welcome.
Should I put all import statement at the top?
Here is the code:
from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod
from cachetools import cached, TTLCache
class Fibonacci(metaclass=ABCMeta): # Abstract prototype ######################
def fibonacci(self, n):
if isinstance(n, int) and n >= 0:
return self._fibonacci(n) if n >= 2 else [0, 1][n]
raise ValueError
@abstractmethod
def _fibonacci(self, n):
pass
class FibonacciRecursion(Fibonacci): # 1. Classic and also naive computation ##
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciCacheTools(Fibonacci): # 2. The cache fixes bad algorithm choice
cache = TTLCache(maxsize=1500, ttl=3600)
@cached(cache)
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciAddition(Fibonacci): # 3. It is O(n), not O(2**n) as before ####
def _fibonacci(self, n):
f0, f1 = 0, 1
for _ in range(1, n):
f0, f1 = f1, f0 + f1
return f1
class FibonacciAdditionPlus(FibonacciAddition): # 4. Exploiting the test: O(1)
def __init__(self):
self._n = 2
self._f0 = 1
self._f1 = 1
def _fibonacci(self, n):
if n == self._n:
return self._f1
if n < self._n:
self.__init__()
for _ in range(self._n, n):
self._f0, self._f1 = self._f1, self._f0 + self._f1
self._n = n
return self._f1
class FibonacciFormula(Fibonacci): # 5. Formula of Binet, Moivre, and Bernoulli
# Exact integer until Fibonacci(71)
# Float error at Fibonacci(1475) OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
S5 = 5.0 ** 0.5 # Square root of 5
def _fibonacci(self, n):
phi = (1.0 + FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # φ Python speaks greek!
psi = (1.0 - FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # ψ PyCharm doesn't like it ;-(
return int((phi ** n - psi ** n) / FibonacciFormula.S5)
if __name__ == '__main__': # Testing ... ######################################
import platform
import time
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def func1(x, a, b): # function to fit exponential Fibonacci
return '%f * %f**x' % (a, np.exp(b)) if x is None else a*np.exp(b*x)
def func2(x, a, b, c): # function to fit with cubic curve
return '%f + %f*x + %f*x**2' % (a, b, c) if x is None else a+x*(b+c*x)
def first_test(fibonacci_max, repeat): # Collect times, curve fit, and plot
methods = [ # Function to test, color, poly fit, curve fit
[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1],
[FibonacciCacheTools(), 'orange', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAddition(), 'green', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAdditionPlus(), 'red', 1, func2],
[FibonacciFormula(), 'purple', 1, func2],
]
print('Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds')
n_max = fibonacci_max - 1 # we start from n=2 (0, 1 - the same time)
y = [[0 for _ in range(n_max)] for _ in methods]
for j in range(n_max): # Run tests and collect times in array y #######
n = j + 2
old = None
for i, method in enumerate(methods):
best = None
for k in range(repeat):
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
result = method[0].fibonacci(n)
stop = time.perf_counter_ns()
duration = stop - start
if best is None or duration < best:
best = duration
if old is None:
old = result
elif result != old:
print(
'Error: different results %d and %d for function %s'
' F(%d) in call # %d,' %
(old, result, method[0].fibonacci.__name__, n, k+1))
exit(1)
if i == 0:
print(n, ',', old, sep='', end='')
print(',', best, sep='', end='')
y[i][j] = best
print()
plt.figure(1) # Start plotting ########################################
plt.suptitle('Time(n) Complexity of Fibonacci Algorithms. n = 2,3,...,'
'%d,%d' % (n_max, fibonacci_max))
x = np.array([i + 2 for i in range(n_max)])
plt.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.3)
for i in range(4):
plt.subplot(221 + i)
for j, m in enumerate(methods):
s = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[j], 'tab:' + m[1], label=s)
plt.title(['time in nanoseconds', 'log(Time)', 'zoom', 'zoom+'][i])
plt.grid(True)
if i == 0:
plt.legend()
elif i == 1:
plt.semilogy()
else:
x_min, x_max, _, _ = plt.axis()
plt.axis([x_min, x_max, 0.0, 30000.0 if i == 2 else 3000.0])
for i, m in enumerate(methods): # Curve and poly fitting ##############
plt.figure(2 + i)
name = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[i], 'ko', label=name)
c, _ = curve_fit(m[3], x, y[i])
c_name = 'curve fit:' + m[3](None, *c)
plt.plot(x, m[3](x, *c), 'y-', label=c_name)
p = np.poly1d(np.polyfit(x, y[i], m[2]))
p_name = 'poly fit: ' + str(p)
plt.plot(x, p(x), m[1], label=p_name)
plt.legend()
print('%sn%sn%sn' % (name, c_name, p_name))
plt.show()
print('Python version :', platform.python_version())
print(' build :', platform.python_build())
print(' compiler :n', platform.python_compiler())
first_test(fibonacci_max=30, repeat=10)
The output:
$ python fibonacci.py
Python version : 3.7.3
build : ('v3.7.3:ef4ec6ed12', 'Mar 25 2019 16:52:21')
compiler :
Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.57)
Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds
2,1,1027,2598,731,526,874
3,2,1638,2516,769,523,956
4,3,2818,2470,806,532,904
5,5,4592,2413,840,526,902
6,8,7571,2531,936,562,955
7,13,12376,2490,909,538,999
8,21,20528,2588,972,551,973
9,34,33349,2628,1074,581,1037
10,55,60107,2782,1116,581,997
11,89,85465,2421,1056,534,939
12,144,137395,2429,1101,534,942
13,233,222623,2411,1136,539,955
14,377,360054,2476,1216,551,938
15,610,600066,2736,1332,563,1006
16,987,971239,2529,1323,541,937
17,1597,1575092,2479,1359,552,937
18,2584,2565900,2632,1464,563,962
19,4181,4071666,2583,1485,555,953
20,6765,6630634,2503,1481,532,914
21,10946,10843455,2527,1571,522,930
22,17711,18277770,2617,1646,548,952
23,28657,28838223,2620,1739,573,967
24,46368,47167582,2481,1713,543,932
25,75025,77326177,2481,1709,531,909
26,121393,126154837,2587,1799,546,944
27,196418,205083621,2527,1857,548,942
28,317811,329818895,2444,1822,531,952
29,514229,533409650,2493,1932,551,946
30,832040,866064386,2509,1967,553,947
Recursion
curve fit:448.753271 * 1.619991**x
poly fit: 2
1.751e+06 x - 4.225e+07 x + 1.829e+08
CacheTools
curve fit:2492.458456 + 7.778994*x + -0.252776*x**2
poly fit:
-0.3099 x + 2539
Addition
curve fit:636.162562 + 42.475661*x + 0.074421*x**2
poly fit:
44.86 x + 622.3
AdditionPlus
curve fit:528.372414 + 2.642894*x + -0.076063*x**2
poly fit:
0.2089 x + 542.5
Formula
curve fit:920.230213 + 5.076194*x + -0.163003*x**2
poly fit:
-0.1399 x + 950.5
Graphics:
python algorithm comparative-review complexity fibonacci-sequence
New contributor
$endgroup$
It is my first use of classes in Python. I wanted to create something useful and try some new things as I learn this cool language: strategy pattern, testing with nanoseconds precision, curve/poly fitting, and making a graphic presentation. The budget was 150 lines of code: 50 for five Fibonacci number calculations, 50 for testing and checking the results, 50 for presentation. PyCharm was my mentor and strict format enforcer: 22 blank lines. I made it in 149
lines and then added one comment line. Could be a better “curve fit” and “poly fit” string formulas, but it will force me to go over 150 lines.
Here is what this program does:
- Calculates Fibonacci numbers from 2 to 30 by five different methods. Tests if all methods produce the same results and keep the shortest runtime from 10 tries.
- Plots all best times in nanoseconds at four subplots: regular axes, log Y, zoom to 30000 nSec, and zoom+ to 3000 nSec.
- It uses curve_fit from scipy and polyfit from numpy to find the best parameters for math formulas describing the time complexity of these Fibonacci algorithms.
I was happy to see the recursion as (446 * 1.62 ** n) just after the first tests and bug fixing - that is a theoretical O(φ**n) or 1.6180339887…
Critique and suggestion on how to write a better code are welcome.
Should I put all import statement at the top?
Here is the code:
from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod
from cachetools import cached, TTLCache
class Fibonacci(metaclass=ABCMeta): # Abstract prototype ######################
def fibonacci(self, n):
if isinstance(n, int) and n >= 0:
return self._fibonacci(n) if n >= 2 else [0, 1][n]
raise ValueError
@abstractmethod
def _fibonacci(self, n):
pass
class FibonacciRecursion(Fibonacci): # 1. Classic and also naive computation ##
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciCacheTools(Fibonacci): # 2. The cache fixes bad algorithm choice
cache = TTLCache(maxsize=1500, ttl=3600)
@cached(cache)
def _fibonacci(self, n):
return self.fibonacci(n - 1) + self.fibonacci(n - 2)
class FibonacciAddition(Fibonacci): # 3. It is O(n), not O(2**n) as before ####
def _fibonacci(self, n):
f0, f1 = 0, 1
for _ in range(1, n):
f0, f1 = f1, f0 + f1
return f1
class FibonacciAdditionPlus(FibonacciAddition): # 4. Exploiting the test: O(1)
def __init__(self):
self._n = 2
self._f0 = 1
self._f1 = 1
def _fibonacci(self, n):
if n == self._n:
return self._f1
if n < self._n:
self.__init__()
for _ in range(self._n, n):
self._f0, self._f1 = self._f1, self._f0 + self._f1
self._n = n
return self._f1
class FibonacciFormula(Fibonacci): # 5. Formula of Binet, Moivre, and Bernoulli
# Exact integer until Fibonacci(71)
# Float error at Fibonacci(1475) OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
S5 = 5.0 ** 0.5 # Square root of 5
def _fibonacci(self, n):
phi = (1.0 + FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # φ Python speaks greek!
psi = (1.0 - FibonacciFormula.S5) / 2.0 # ψ PyCharm doesn't like it ;-(
return int((phi ** n - psi ** n) / FibonacciFormula.S5)
if __name__ == '__main__': # Testing ... ######################################
import platform
import time
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def func1(x, a, b): # function to fit exponential Fibonacci
return '%f * %f**x' % (a, np.exp(b)) if x is None else a*np.exp(b*x)
def func2(x, a, b, c): # function to fit with cubic curve
return '%f + %f*x + %f*x**2' % (a, b, c) if x is None else a+x*(b+c*x)
def first_test(fibonacci_max, repeat): # Collect times, curve fit, and plot
methods = [ # Function to test, color, poly fit, curve fit
[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1],
[FibonacciCacheTools(), 'orange', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAddition(), 'green', 1, func2],
[FibonacciAdditionPlus(), 'red', 1, func2],
[FibonacciFormula(), 'purple', 1, func2],
]
print('Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds')
n_max = fibonacci_max - 1 # we start from n=2 (0, 1 - the same time)
y = [[0 for _ in range(n_max)] for _ in methods]
for j in range(n_max): # Run tests and collect times in array y #######
n = j + 2
old = None
for i, method in enumerate(methods):
best = None
for k in range(repeat):
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
result = method[0].fibonacci(n)
stop = time.perf_counter_ns()
duration = stop - start
if best is None or duration < best:
best = duration
if old is None:
old = result
elif result != old:
print(
'Error: different results %d and %d for function %s'
' F(%d) in call # %d,' %
(old, result, method[0].fibonacci.__name__, n, k+1))
exit(1)
if i == 0:
print(n, ',', old, sep='', end='')
print(',', best, sep='', end='')
y[i][j] = best
print()
plt.figure(1) # Start plotting ########################################
plt.suptitle('Time(n) Complexity of Fibonacci Algorithms. n = 2,3,...,'
'%d,%d' % (n_max, fibonacci_max))
x = np.array([i + 2 for i in range(n_max)])
plt.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.3)
for i in range(4):
plt.subplot(221 + i)
for j, m in enumerate(methods):
s = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[j], 'tab:' + m[1], label=s)
plt.title(['time in nanoseconds', 'log(Time)', 'zoom', 'zoom+'][i])
plt.grid(True)
if i == 0:
plt.legend()
elif i == 1:
plt.semilogy()
else:
x_min, x_max, _, _ = plt.axis()
plt.axis([x_min, x_max, 0.0, 30000.0 if i == 2 else 3000.0])
for i, m in enumerate(methods): # Curve and poly fitting ##############
plt.figure(2 + i)
name = str(m[0].__class__.__name__)[len('Fibonacci'):]
plt.plot(x, y[i], 'ko', label=name)
c, _ = curve_fit(m[3], x, y[i])
c_name = 'curve fit:' + m[3](None, *c)
plt.plot(x, m[3](x, *c), 'y-', label=c_name)
p = np.poly1d(np.polyfit(x, y[i], m[2]))
p_name = 'poly fit: ' + str(p)
plt.plot(x, p(x), m[1], label=p_name)
plt.legend()
print('%sn%sn%sn' % (name, c_name, p_name))
plt.show()
print('Python version :', platform.python_version())
print(' build :', platform.python_build())
print(' compiler :n', platform.python_compiler())
first_test(fibonacci_max=30, repeat=10)
The output:
$ python fibonacci.py
Python version : 3.7.3
build : ('v3.7.3:ef4ec6ed12', 'Mar 25 2019 16:52:21')
compiler :
Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.57)
Number,Fibonacci,Times for all methods in nanoseconds
2,1,1027,2598,731,526,874
3,2,1638,2516,769,523,956
4,3,2818,2470,806,532,904
5,5,4592,2413,840,526,902
6,8,7571,2531,936,562,955
7,13,12376,2490,909,538,999
8,21,20528,2588,972,551,973
9,34,33349,2628,1074,581,1037
10,55,60107,2782,1116,581,997
11,89,85465,2421,1056,534,939
12,144,137395,2429,1101,534,942
13,233,222623,2411,1136,539,955
14,377,360054,2476,1216,551,938
15,610,600066,2736,1332,563,1006
16,987,971239,2529,1323,541,937
17,1597,1575092,2479,1359,552,937
18,2584,2565900,2632,1464,563,962
19,4181,4071666,2583,1485,555,953
20,6765,6630634,2503,1481,532,914
21,10946,10843455,2527,1571,522,930
22,17711,18277770,2617,1646,548,952
23,28657,28838223,2620,1739,573,967
24,46368,47167582,2481,1713,543,932
25,75025,77326177,2481,1709,531,909
26,121393,126154837,2587,1799,546,944
27,196418,205083621,2527,1857,548,942
28,317811,329818895,2444,1822,531,952
29,514229,533409650,2493,1932,551,946
30,832040,866064386,2509,1967,553,947
Recursion
curve fit:448.753271 * 1.619991**x
poly fit: 2
1.751e+06 x - 4.225e+07 x + 1.829e+08
CacheTools
curve fit:2492.458456 + 7.778994*x + -0.252776*x**2
poly fit:
-0.3099 x + 2539
Addition
curve fit:636.162562 + 42.475661*x + 0.074421*x**2
poly fit:
44.86 x + 622.3
AdditionPlus
curve fit:528.372414 + 2.642894*x + -0.076063*x**2
poly fit:
0.2089 x + 542.5
Formula
curve fit:920.230213 + 5.076194*x + -0.163003*x**2
poly fit:
-0.1399 x + 950.5
Graphics:
python algorithm comparative-review complexity fibonacci-sequence
python algorithm comparative-review complexity fibonacci-sequence
New contributor
New contributor
edited Apr 2 at 5:31
200_success
131k17157422
131k17157422
New contributor
asked Apr 2 at 5:16
Alexander LopatinAlexander Lopatin
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Well done on presenting intent and constraints upfront. One thing nagging me: why not choose an argument range to try and push the limits of integer representations (somehow managing run time of the plain recursive approach (and checking for deviation of "the formula result")).
$endgroup$
– greybeard
Apr 2 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome and the comment. Actually, I did comment the line with "[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1]," and "elif result != old:" in order to push the limit and see what will happen next: they stay steady flat O(1) except Addition O(n). Also started to write another test program to see the error in "the formula result" and a possibility to compensate it: the absolute error starts almost as another Fibonacci from 72 with F(n-71) range, but the relative error has a linear grow from 2.0e-15 at F(72) to 4.4e-14 at F(1314).
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Well done on presenting intent and constraints upfront. One thing nagging me: why not choose an argument range to try and push the limits of integer representations (somehow managing run time of the plain recursive approach (and checking for deviation of "the formula result")).
$endgroup$
– greybeard
Apr 2 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome and the comment. Actually, I did comment the line with "[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1]," and "elif result != old:" in order to push the limit and see what will happen next: they stay steady flat O(1) except Addition O(n). Also started to write another test program to see the error in "the formula result" and a possibility to compensate it: the absolute error starts almost as another Fibonacci from 72 with F(n-71) range, but the relative error has a linear grow from 2.0e-15 at F(72) to 4.4e-14 at F(1314).
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 8:51
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Well done on presenting intent and constraints upfront. One thing nagging me: why not choose an argument range to try and push the limits of integer representations (somehow managing run time of the plain recursive approach (and checking for deviation of "the formula result")).
$endgroup$
– greybeard
Apr 2 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Well done on presenting intent and constraints upfront. One thing nagging me: why not choose an argument range to try and push the limits of integer representations (somehow managing run time of the plain recursive approach (and checking for deviation of "the formula result")).
$endgroup$
– greybeard
Apr 2 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome and the comment. Actually, I did comment the line with "[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1]," and "elif result != old:" in order to push the limit and see what will happen next: they stay steady flat O(1) except Addition O(n). Also started to write another test program to see the error in "the formula result" and a possibility to compensate it: the absolute error starts almost as another Fibonacci from 72 with F(n-71) range, but the relative error has a linear grow from 2.0e-15 at F(72) to 4.4e-14 at F(1314).
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 8:51
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome and the comment. Actually, I did comment the line with "[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1]," and "elif result != old:" in order to push the limit and see what will happen next: they stay steady flat O(1) except Addition O(n). Also started to write another test program to see the error in "the formula result" and a possibility to compensate it: the absolute error starts almost as another Fibonacci from 72 with F(n-71) range, but the relative error has a linear grow from 2.0e-15 at F(72) to 4.4e-14 at F(1314).
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 8:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not really sure why you used classes for your Fibonacci functions. In python it is generally better style to just use a function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Alexander Lopatin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216694%2ftimen-complexity-of-fibonacci-algorithms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not really sure why you used classes for your Fibonacci functions. In python it is generally better style to just use a function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not really sure why you used classes for your Fibonacci functions. In python it is generally better style to just use a function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not really sure why you used classes for your Fibonacci functions. In python it is generally better style to just use a function.
$endgroup$
I'm not really sure why you used classes for your Fibonacci functions. In python it is generally better style to just use a function.
answered Apr 2 at 18:07
Oscar SmithOscar Smith
2,9411123
2,9411123
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
$begingroup$
I started with functions but soon realized that they will benefit from common class if I want to maintain, share this project, and others contribute to it. I had the questions: How I can enforce all functions have the same interface? Some of the function can benefit from initialization and storing the temporary variables between calls. How this can be done uniformly? How I just write a code to check the argument once and reuse for all? How do I compare the performance of the same function with different parameters (cache size)? The classes had all the answers to these my questions.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 22:52
add a comment |
Alexander Lopatin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexander Lopatin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexander Lopatin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexander Lopatin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216694%2ftimen-complexity-of-fibonacci-algorithms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to Code Review! Well done on presenting intent and constraints upfront. One thing nagging me: why not choose an argument range to try and push the limits of integer representations (somehow managing run time of the plain recursive approach (and checking for deviation of "the formula result")).
$endgroup$
– greybeard
Apr 2 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome and the comment. Actually, I did comment the line with "[FibonacciRecursion(), 'blue', 2, func1]," and "elif result != old:" in order to push the limit and see what will happen next: they stay steady flat O(1) except Addition O(n). Also started to write another test program to see the error in "the formula result" and a possibility to compensate it: the absolute error starts almost as another Fibonacci from 72 with F(n-71) range, but the relative error has a linear grow from 2.0e-15 at F(72) to 4.4e-14 at F(1314).
$endgroup$
– Alexander Lopatin
Apr 2 at 8:51