Are there languages with no euphemisms?Are there any languages that mark nouns as mass?How do languages with...

How to check is there any negative term in a large list?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Efficient way to transport a Stargate

Crossing the line between justified force and brutality

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?

Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts

Method to test if a number is a perfect power?

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Sort a list by elements of another list

Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

Irrational meter - why the mark of a triplet in 4 half notes

Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?

Can "Reverse Gravity" affect Meteor Swarm?

System.debug(JSON.Serialize(o)) Not longer shows full string

How to pronounce the slash sign

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

Invade the Pyramid if you Dare



Are there languages with no euphemisms?


Are there any languages that mark nouns as mass?How do languages with imperfect aspect typically convey distinctions between habitual, iterative, and progressive aspects?What is the relationship between syntax and semantics?Languages with no past tense?Why can verbs with imperfective morphology have a perfective meaning?Is language is more about “intent” rather than a great tool for communication?Is there a term that refers to eliminating a word from a text being translated in order to achieve dynamic equivalence?Are there any languages that either effectively don't have verbs or that somehow get around using a “standard” verb system?What are some plausible patterns that could develop in alien languages?Triggering emotions with language













2















I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?










share|improve this question



























    2















    I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2








      I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?










      share|improve this question














      I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?







      semantics sociolinguistics






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay

      212




      212






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".



          But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.



          The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

            – Luke Sawczak
            26 mins ago











          • Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

            – Wilson
            24 mins ago











          • I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

            – Luke Sawczak
            20 mins ago



















          1














          Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
          Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here



          As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.



          Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "312"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30990%2fare-there-languages-with-no-euphemisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".



            But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.



            The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              26 mins ago











            • Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

              – Wilson
              24 mins ago











            • I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              20 mins ago
















            3














            It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".



            But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.



            The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              26 mins ago











            • Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

              – Wilson
              24 mins ago











            • I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              20 mins ago














            3












            3








            3







            It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".



            But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.



            The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.






            share|improve this answer













            It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".



            But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.



            The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            WilsonWilson

            1,816520




            1,816520








            • 1





              "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              26 mins ago











            • Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

              – Wilson
              24 mins ago











            • I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              20 mins ago














            • 1





              "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              26 mins ago











            • Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

              – Wilson
              24 mins ago











            • I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

              – Luke Sawczak
              20 mins ago








            1




            1





            "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

            – Luke Sawczak
            26 mins ago





            "Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)

            – Luke Sawczak
            26 mins ago













            Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

            – Wilson
            24 mins ago





            Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?

            – Wilson
            24 mins ago













            I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

            – Luke Sawczak
            20 mins ago





            I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)

            – Luke Sawczak
            20 mins ago











            1














            Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
            Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here



            As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.



            Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
              Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here



              As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.



              Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
                Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here



                As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.



                Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.






                share|improve this answer













                Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
                Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here



                As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.



                Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 25 mins ago









                WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak

                8201422




                8201422






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30990%2fare-there-languages-with-no-euphemisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Fairchild Swearingen Metro Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Innenausstattung | Nutzung | Zwischenfälle...

                    Pilgersdorf Inhaltsverzeichnis Geografie | Geschichte | Bevölkerungsentwicklung | Politik | Kultur...

                    Marineschifffahrtleitung Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Heutige Organisation der NATO | Nationale und...