Are there languages with no euphemisms?Are there any languages that mark nouns as mass?How do languages with...
How to check is there any negative term in a large list?
Go Pregnant or Go Home
Efficient way to transport a Stargate
Crossing the line between justified force and brutality
How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts
Method to test if a number is a perfect power?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Sort a list by elements of another list
Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
Irrational meter - why the mark of a triplet in 4 half notes
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Can "Reverse Gravity" affect Meteor Swarm?
System.debug(JSON.Serialize(o)) Not longer shows full string
How to pronounce the slash sign
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Invade the Pyramid if you Dare
Are there languages with no euphemisms?
Are there any languages that mark nouns as mass?How do languages with imperfect aspect typically convey distinctions between habitual, iterative, and progressive aspects?What is the relationship between syntax and semantics?Languages with no past tense?Why can verbs with imperfective morphology have a perfective meaning?Is language is more about “intent” rather than a great tool for communication?Is there a term that refers to eliminating a word from a text being translated in order to achieve dynamic equivalence?Are there any languages that either effectively don't have verbs or that somehow get around using a “standard” verb system?What are some plausible patterns that could develop in alien languages?Triggering emotions with language
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
add a comment |
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
add a comment |
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
semantics sociolinguistics
asked 1 hour ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
212
212
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
1
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
add a comment |
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30990%2fare-there-languages-with-no-euphemisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
1
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
add a comment |
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
1
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
add a comment |
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,816520
1,816520
1
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
add a comment |
1
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
1
1
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
26 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
24 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
20 mins ago
add a comment |
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
add a comment |
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
add a comment |
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
answered 25 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8201422
8201422
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30990%2fare-there-languages-with-no-euphemisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown