Ggthjy

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

What is the meaning of the simile “quick as silk”?

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Wu formula for manifolds with boundary

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?

representation of vector and matrix in latex

また usage in a dictionary

Is safe to use va_start macro with this as parameter?

representation of vector and matrix in latex

2

i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached

can someone help me out with a way to represent it

matrices vector

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

New contributor

sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....
  
  – David Carlisle
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached

can someone help me out with a way to represent it

matrices vector

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

New contributor

sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....
  
  – David Carlisle
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached

can someone help me out with a way to represent it

matrices vector

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

New contributor

sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

New contributor

sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

New contributor

sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

edited 4 hours ago

Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

New contributor

sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 5 hours ago

sana chsana ch

133

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

1

The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}



% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor

newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}

newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}



% better for typesetting

%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm



begin{document}



Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix

[

renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}

begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}

vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \

scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&

scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &

scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1

end{array}

]



end{document}

I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be

without changing the code in the document body.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help
  
  – sana ch
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.

The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}

begin{document}



begin{align*}

Q &= Aw \

mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\

mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\

vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\

bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}

end{align*}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis
  
  – sana ch
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)
  
  – Mico
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!
  
  – egreg
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

sana ch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485372%2frepresentation-of-vector-and-matrix-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

1

The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}



% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor

newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}

newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}



% better for typesetting

%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm



begin{document}



Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix

[

renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}

begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}

vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \

scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&

scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &

scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1

end{array}

]



end{document}

I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be

without changing the code in the document body.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help
  
  – sana ch
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}



% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor

newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}

newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}



% better for typesetting

%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm



begin{document}



Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix

[

renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}

begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}

vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \

scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&

scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &

scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1

end{array}

]



end{document}

I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be

without changing the code in the document body.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help
  
  – sana ch
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}



% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor

newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}

newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}



% better for typesetting

%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm



begin{document}



Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix

[

renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}

begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}

vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \

scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&

scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &

scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1

end{array}

]



end{document}

I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be

without changing the code in the document body.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}



% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor

newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}

newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}



% better for typesetting

%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm



begin{document}



Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix

[

renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}

begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}

vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \

scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&

scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &

scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1

end{array}

]



end{document}

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

answered 4 hours ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

1

The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.

The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}

begin{document}



begin{align*}

Q &= Aw \

mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\

mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\

vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\

bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}

end{align*}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis
  
  – sana ch
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)
  
  – Mico
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!
  
  – egreg
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.

The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}

begin{document}



begin{align*}

Q &= Aw \

mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\

mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\

vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\

bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}

end{align*}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis
  
  – sana ch
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)
  
  – Mico
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!
  
  – egreg
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.

The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}

begin{document}



begin{align*}

Q &= Aw \

mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\

mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\

vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\

bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}

end{align*}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,bm}

begin{document}



begin{align*}

Q &= Aw \

mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\

mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\

vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\

bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}

end{align*}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

answered 4 hours ago

MicoMico

287k32392781