Ggthjy

Why exactly do action photographers need high fps burst cameras?

Would the Vulcan nerve pinch work on a Borg drone?

How to say "Brexit" in Latin?

How to remove lines through the legend markers in ListPlot?

Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?

How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL

Word or phrase for showing great skill at something WITHOUT formal training in it

Avoiding morning and evening handshakes

Would a National Army of mercenaries be a feasible idea?

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

How can my powered armor quickly replace its ceramic plates?

How can I deliver in-universe written lore to players without it being dry exposition?

Why is mind meld hard for T'pol in Star Trek: Enterprise?

Cookies - Should the toggles be on?

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

Explain the objections to these measures against human trafficking

Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?

Table formatting top left corner caption

Is that a center tap tranformer just labelled differently?

Injecting creativity into a cookbook

Normalization for two bulk RNA-Seq samples to enable reliable fold-change estimation between genes

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

awk + sum all numbers

Why avoid shared user accounts?

Can making a creature unable to attack after it has been assigned as an attacker remove it from combat?

What happens if a blocking creature with flying loses flying?Can Act of Treason allow a Detained creature to attack?Can abilities with no “tap/untap” cost be activated while a creature has summoning sickness?Can I steal a creature then block my own attack with it?How much damage do I deal? (How is damage dealt if an attacker gains power as combat damage is being assigned?)Does first strike damage occur before normal damage?Can I play blessed alliance after damage resolves to make him sac a creature I didn't kill?Is there a term for defensive effects that only/primarily function for attacking creatures?Can I give a creature spell hexproof to prevent it from being countered?MTG: Creature can't attack unless X after “declare attackers”Can a Thallid create saprolings at end of combat phase and still kill attacker

7

1

Kulrath Knight has an effect that states 'Creatures your opponents control with counters on them can't attack or block.' So if a creature is assigned as an attacker and subsequestly get a counter placed on it prior to combat resolution. Does that remove it from combat.

magic-the-gathering

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Related: boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/7343/…
  
  – GendoIkari
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @GendoIkari close-enough that it might be a dupe, but this one is specifically asking about attacking and not blocking so I figured it was worth an answer. Plus there is clean/clear rule in CR so why not.
  
  – Malco
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Malco Yeah I don't think it's a duplicate; although there could easily be another question that these could then be both duplicates of. But unless this same basic question pops up a few more times in a few more forms; I don't think there's a need for such a question.
  
  – GendoIkari
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A -1/-1 counter can remove a creature from combat (by killing it), but I suspect that that's not what you meant.
  
  – Arcanist Lupus
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @ArcanistLupus It's the interaction with Kulrath Knight's ability "Creatures your opponents control with counters on them can't attack or block." that Bill is referring to, asking if making a creature unable to attack after it was declared as attacking invalidates and reverses that attack (I think it does in YuGiOh and causes confusion for players coming from that game)
  
  – Andrew
  8 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

7

1

Kulrath Knight has an effect that states 'Creatures your opponents control with counters on them can't attack or block.' So if a creature is assigned as an attacker and subsequestly get a counter placed on it prior to combat resolution. Does that remove it from combat.

magic-the-gathering

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Related: boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/7343/…
  
  – GendoIkari
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @GendoIkari close-enough that it might be a dupe, but this one is specifically asking about attacking and not blocking so I figured it was worth an answer. Plus there is clean/clear rule in CR so why not.
  
  – Malco
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Malco Yeah I don't think it's a duplicate; although there could easily be another question that these could then be both duplicates of. But unless this same basic question pops up a few more times in a few more forms; I don't think there's a need for such a question.
  
  – GendoIkari
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A -1/-1 counter can remove a creature from combat (by killing it), but I suspect that that's not what you meant.
  
  – Arcanist Lupus
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @ArcanistLupus It's the interaction with Kulrath Knight's ability "Creatures your opponents control with counters on them can't attack or block." that Bill is referring to, asking if making a creature unable to attack after it was declared as attacking invalidates and reverses that attack (I think it does in YuGiOh and causes confusion for players coming from that game)
  
  – Andrew
  8 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

Kulrath Knight has an effect that states 'Creatures your opponents control with counters on them can't attack or block.' So if a creature is assigned as an attacker and subsequestly get a counter placed on it prior to combat resolution. Does that remove it from combat.

magic-the-gathering

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

edited 3 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

asked 10 hours ago

BillBill

39718

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

11

No, making a creature "unable to attack or block" after attackers have been declared does not remove it from combat.

An ability that says "Creatures can't Attack or Block" means that they can not be declared as blockers or attackers. If they are already attacking or blocking it is too late and they will not be removed from combat.

506.4a: Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

add a comment | 

1

No, creatures that are already declared as attacking (or blocking) are not removed from combat because they could no longer be legally declared as an attacker or blocker. That is only checked when declaring the attack or block, and never again for that combat. This is covered by the comprehensive rules(Emphasis mine):

506.4a Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

There are effects that will remove a creature from combat, these though all specifically say they do so, on cards like Maze of Ith, Reconnaissance or Illusionist's Gambit. The ways that a creature CAN be removed from combat are spelled out here:

506.4 A permanent is removed from combat if it leaves the battlefield, if its controller changes, if it phases out, if an effect specifically removes it from combat, if it's a planeswalker that's being attacked and stops being a planeswalker, or if it's an attacking or blocking creature that regenerates (see rule 701.14) or stops being a creature. A creature that's removed from combat stops being an attacking, blocking, blocked, and/or unblocked creature. A planeswalker that's removed from combat stops being attacked.

There are also effects that can get around combat restrictions, usually effects that force a creature into play tapped and attacking, this lets you get around effects like Ensnaring Bridge with bigger ninjas, like
Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni, or past effects like Crawlspace by creating tokens when attacking with Hero of Bladehold or Tilonalli's Summoner. If an effect causes creatures to enter with a counter, say Rhythm of the Wild it will also bypass Kulrath Knight that turn.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Time Stop does not explicitly say it removes creatures from combat (and the foil hilariously lacks all of the "reminder" text entirely), but since there's no other logically reasonable interpretation of the card, there is a ruling to that effect.
  
  – Kevin
  1 hour ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "147"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45341%2fcan-making-a-creature-unable-to-attack-after-it-has-been-assigned-as-an-attacker%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

11

No, making a creature "unable to attack or block" after attackers have been declared does not remove it from combat.

An ability that says "Creatures can't Attack or Block" means that they can not be declared as blockers or attackers. If they are already attacking or blocking it is too late and they will not be removed from combat.

506.4a: Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

add a comment | 

11

No, making a creature "unable to attack or block" after attackers have been declared does not remove it from combat.

An ability that says "Creatures can't Attack or Block" means that they can not be declared as blockers or attackers. If they are already attacking or blocking it is too late and they will not be removed from combat.

506.4a: Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

add a comment | 

No, making a creature "unable to attack or block" after attackers have been declared does not remove it from combat.

An ability that says "Creatures can't Attack or Block" means that they can not be declared as blockers or attackers. If they are already attacking or blocking it is too late and they will not be removed from combat.

506.4a: Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

edited 8 hours ago

doppelgreener

16.1k858122

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

answered 10 hours ago

MalcoMalco

6,6761454

1

No, creatures that are already declared as attacking (or blocking) are not removed from combat because they could no longer be legally declared as an attacker or blocker. That is only checked when declaring the attack or block, and never again for that combat. This is covered by the comprehensive rules(Emphasis mine):

506.4a Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

There are effects that will remove a creature from combat, these though all specifically say they do so, on cards like Maze of Ith, Reconnaissance or Illusionist's Gambit. The ways that a creature CAN be removed from combat are spelled out here:

506.4 A permanent is removed from combat if it leaves the battlefield, if its controller changes, if it phases out, if an effect specifically removes it from combat, if it's a planeswalker that's being attacked and stops being a planeswalker, or if it's an attacking or blocking creature that regenerates (see rule 701.14) or stops being a creature. A creature that's removed from combat stops being an attacking, blocking, blocked, and/or unblocked creature. A planeswalker that's removed from combat stops being attacked.

There are also effects that can get around combat restrictions, usually effects that force a creature into play tapped and attacking, this lets you get around effects like Ensnaring Bridge with bigger ninjas, like
Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni, or past effects like Crawlspace by creating tokens when attacking with Hero of Bladehold or Tilonalli's Summoner. If an effect causes creatures to enter with a counter, say Rhythm of the Wild it will also bypass Kulrath Knight that turn.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Time Stop does not explicitly say it removes creatures from combat (and the foil hilariously lacks all of the "reminder" text entirely), but since there's no other logically reasonable interpretation of the card, there is a ruling to that effect.
  
  – Kevin
  1 hour ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

No, creatures that are already declared as attacking (or blocking) are not removed from combat because they could no longer be legally declared as an attacker or blocker. That is only checked when declaring the attack or block, and never again for that combat. This is covered by the comprehensive rules(Emphasis mine):

506.4a Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

There are effects that will remove a creature from combat, these though all specifically say they do so, on cards like Maze of Ith, Reconnaissance or Illusionist's Gambit. The ways that a creature CAN be removed from combat are spelled out here:

506.4 A permanent is removed from combat if it leaves the battlefield, if its controller changes, if it phases out, if an effect specifically removes it from combat, if it's a planeswalker that's being attacked and stops being a planeswalker, or if it's an attacking or blocking creature that regenerates (see rule 701.14) or stops being a creature. A creature that's removed from combat stops being an attacking, blocking, blocked, and/or unblocked creature. A planeswalker that's removed from combat stops being attacked.

There are also effects that can get around combat restrictions, usually effects that force a creature into play tapped and attacking, this lets you get around effects like Ensnaring Bridge with bigger ninjas, like
Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni, or past effects like Crawlspace by creating tokens when attacking with Hero of Bladehold or Tilonalli's Summoner. If an effect causes creatures to enter with a counter, say Rhythm of the Wild it will also bypass Kulrath Knight that turn.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Time Stop does not explicitly say it removes creatures from combat (and the foil hilariously lacks all of the "reminder" text entirely), but since there's no other logically reasonable interpretation of the card, there is a ruling to that effect.
  
  – Kevin
  1 hour ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

No, creatures that are already declared as attacking (or blocking) are not removed from combat because they could no longer be legally declared as an attacker or blocker. That is only checked when declaring the attack or block, and never again for that combat. This is covered by the comprehensive rules(Emphasis mine):

506.4a Once a creature has been declared as an attacking or blocking creature, spells or abilities that would have kept that creature from attacking or blocking don't remove the creature from combat.

There are effects that will remove a creature from combat, these though all specifically say they do so, on cards like Maze of Ith, Reconnaissance or Illusionist's Gambit. The ways that a creature CAN be removed from combat are spelled out here:

506.4 A permanent is removed from combat if it leaves the battlefield, if its controller changes, if it phases out, if an effect specifically removes it from combat, if it's a planeswalker that's being attacked and stops being a planeswalker, or if it's an attacking or blocking creature that regenerates (see rule 701.14) or stops being a creature. A creature that's removed from combat stops being an attacking, blocking, blocked, and/or unblocked creature. A planeswalker that's removed from combat stops being attacked.

There are also effects that can get around combat restrictions, usually effects that force a creature into play tapped and attacking, this lets you get around effects like Ensnaring Bridge with bigger ninjas, like
Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni, or past effects like Crawlspace by creating tokens when attacking with Hero of Bladehold or Tilonalli's Summoner. If an effect causes creatures to enter with a counter, say Rhythm of the Wild it will also bypass Kulrath Knight that turn.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838

answered 7 hours ago

AndrewAndrew

5,259838