High pressure canisters of air as gun-less projectilesCompression Rifle Designs for Combat UseWeaponising...

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?

What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?

Word or phrase for showing great skill at something without formal training in it

Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?

Closed form for these polynomials?

How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?

High pressure canisters of air as gun-less projectiles

Could flying insects re-enter the Earth's atmosphere from space without burning up?

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

When teaching someone how to prove a function is uniformly continuous, using epsilon/delta, which example would be among the simplest?

What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?

Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview

What do you call a fact that doesn't match the settings?

Why did Bush enact a completely different foreign policy to that which he espoused during the 2000 Presidential election campaign?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?

Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits

Everyone is beautiful

Issues with new Macs: Hardware makes them difficult for me to use. What options might be available in the future?

What kind of hardware implements Fourier transform?

Are there any outlying considerations if I treat donning a shield as an object interaction during the first round of combat?

Can you earn endless XP using a Flameskull and its self-revival feature?

Eww, those bytes are gross

Avoiding morning and evening handshakes



High pressure canisters of air as gun-less projectiles


Compression Rifle Designs for Combat UseWeaponising Local Air PressureSpace weaponry?A non-lethal gunSafe destruction of kinetic projectilesAdvantages of Ball bearing projectiles over Bullets?Railgun projectiles against ERA protectionBuilding a Syringe GunStopping Ferromagnetic ProjectilesWeaponry made from brittle steel: splintering projectilesWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?













4












$begingroup$


Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    26 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$


Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    26 mins ago
















4












4








4





$begingroup$


Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.







weapons






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Redwolf ProgramsRedwolf Programs

9481722




9481722












  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    26 mins ago




















  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    26 mins ago


















$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
"The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
$endgroup$
– aroth
26 mins ago






$begingroup$
"The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
$endgroup$
– aroth
26 mins ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



enter image description here



First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can't stop laughing at the first one...
    $endgroup$
    – Redwolf Programs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Thyme the Second
    50 mins ago



















1












$begingroup$

A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140601%2fhigh-pressure-canisters-of-air-as-gun-less-projectiles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      50 mins ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      50 mins ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    elemtilaselemtilas

    13.9k22861




    13.9k22861








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      50 mins ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      50 mins ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Can't stop laughing at the first one...
    $endgroup$
    – Redwolf Programs
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Can't stop laughing at the first one...
    $endgroup$
    – Redwolf Programs
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    1 hour ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Thyme the Second
    50 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Thyme the Second
    50 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



    The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



    They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



    These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



      The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



      They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



      These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



        The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



        They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



        These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



        The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



        They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



        These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 39 mins ago









        Justin Thyme the SecondJustin Thyme the Second

        5826




        5826






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140601%2fhigh-pressure-canisters-of-air-as-gun-less-projectiles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            is 'sed' thread safeWhat should someone know about using Python scripts in the shell?Nexenta bash script uses...

            How do i solve the “ No module named 'mlxtend' ” issue on Jupyter?

            Pilgersdorf Inhaltsverzeichnis Geografie | Geschichte | Bevölkerungsentwicklung | Politik | Kultur...