Please help me understand the following solutionWhat is the second principle of finite induction?(Inductive...
Issues with new Macs: Hardware makes them difficult for me to use. What options might be available in the future?
Unwarranted claim of higher degree of accuracy in zircon geochronology
Number of FLOP (Floating Point Operations) for exponentiation
What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?
En Passant For Beginners
What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?
Why did Bush enact a completely different foreign policy to that which he espoused during the 2000 Presidential election campaign?
QGIS: use geometry from different layer in symbology expression
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
Tikzing a circled star
Quenching swords in dragon blood; why?
How did the original light saber work?
How can I improve my fireworks photography?
Manipulating a general length function
Does the "particle exchange" operator have any validity?
Why can a 352GB NumPy ndarray be used on an 8GB memory macOS computer?
Approaches to criticizing short fiction
Slow moving projectiles from a hand-held weapon - how do they reach the target?
Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?
I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?
Are there any outlying considerations if I treat donning a shield as an object interaction during the first round of combat?
Pendulum Rotation
Please help me understand the following solution
What is the second principle of finite induction?(Inductive Proofs) Show why one inductive hypothesis works, and the other does not.Proving Inequalities using InductionFrobenius coin problem, 5 and 9Practice Examples of Proofs by Induction, Direct/Indirect MethodWhat does the constant mean in Big O notation?Showing a sequence defined recursively is convergentProving that $n! leq 2*(frac{n}2)^n$Prove by Induction help please???Proof by Mathematical Induction for Inequality
$begingroup$
Prove by induction of n
$sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$
begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}
Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.
Questions
- How the inequality works
Wouldn't
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $
become
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$
and then
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $
instead of
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $
- My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.
discrete-mathematics induction
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove by induction of n
$sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$
begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}
Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.
Questions
- How the inequality works
Wouldn't
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $
become
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$
and then
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $
instead of
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $
- My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.
discrete-mathematics induction
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove by induction of n
$sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$
begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}
Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.
Questions
- How the inequality works
Wouldn't
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $
become
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$
and then
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $
instead of
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $
- My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.
discrete-mathematics induction
$endgroup$
Prove by induction of n
$sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$
begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}
Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.
Questions
- How the inequality works
Wouldn't
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $
become
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$
and then
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $
instead of
$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $
- My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.
discrete-mathematics induction
discrete-mathematics induction
asked 1 hour ago
BrownieBrownie
947
947
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
$$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
begin{align*}
sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
& leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
& = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
end{align*}
So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.
The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3133089%2fplease-help-me-understand-the-following-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
$$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
begin{align*}
sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
& leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
& = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
end{align*}
So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
$$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
begin{align*}
sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
& leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
& = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
end{align*}
So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
$$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
begin{align*}
sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
& leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
& = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
end{align*}
So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.
$endgroup$
Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
$$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
begin{align*}
sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
& leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
& = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
& leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
& = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
end{align*}
So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.
edited 58 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
AJYAJY
4,18521128
4,18521128
1
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
$endgroup$
– AJY
57 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
$begingroup$
So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
51 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
$endgroup$
– AJY
48 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.
The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.
The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.
The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$
$endgroup$
Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.
The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$
answered 1 hour ago
Thomas FjærvikThomas Fjærvik
2038
2038
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
$endgroup$
– Brownie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that would be the same.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Fjærvik
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$
$endgroup$
If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$
edited 58 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Thomas ShelbyThomas Shelby
3,7192525
3,7192525
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3133089%2fplease-help-me-understand-the-following-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown