Clean Corners for Subdivision The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In ...
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Hopping to infinity along a string of digits
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
How to pronounce 1ターン?
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Make it rain characters
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Simulating Exploding Dice
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
Python - Fishing Simulator
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
How to grep and cut numbes from a file and sum them
Clean Corners for Subdivision
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
Chern class of a vector bundle and the associated projective space bundle
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Arduino Pro Micro - switch off LEDs
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
Clean Corners for Subdivision
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionHow to connect sharp edge with smooth one?Is there an effective way to cut out a portion of a model without destroying it's topology?Beginner question: Increasing poly density for a single side of a cubeA clean way to create crease-cavityEqualize subdivision of a meshRectangular shapes in cylinders with subdivision surfaceConverting the Sponza Palace ceiling into square-like facesMerging characters body parts with a different edge loop countUsing edge loops for sharp edges without distorting the mesh?Bevel and Subsurface makes concave corners weird
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I added a few support edges to get sharp edges and then merged some vertices, so the edge loops don't spread on my whole model. Now I have all quads, but the corners don't look right.
I know that I could get away with triangles on the bottom part, because it is a flat surface, but what about the pointy star trek polygon in the back?
topology
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I added a few support edges to get sharp edges and then merged some vertices, so the edge loops don't spread on my whole model. Now I have all quads, but the corners don't look right.
I know that I could get away with triangles on the bottom part, because it is a flat surface, but what about the pointy star trek polygon in the back?
topology
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I added a few support edges to get sharp edges and then merged some vertices, so the edge loops don't spread on my whole model. Now I have all quads, but the corners don't look right.
I know that I could get away with triangles on the bottom part, because it is a flat surface, but what about the pointy star trek polygon in the back?
topology
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I added a few support edges to get sharp edges and then merged some vertices, so the edge loops don't spread on my whole model. Now I have all quads, but the corners don't look right.
I know that I could get away with triangles on the bottom part, because it is a flat surface, but what about the pointy star trek polygon in the back?
topology
topology
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
asked 5 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Going into wireframe mode shows that the subdivision creates a fold in the model.
Creasing the sides of the star trek polygon pulls the fold out.
That basically solves my problem, because the render looks right, but the topology doesn't:
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason of this distortion is that it's a concave quad, and Subdivision Surface works better with clean quads. You can solve your problem with these tricks:
- add a single edge in the middle of the quad: you won't have any distortion with Subdivision Surface, but the resulting mesh contains triangles
- add this edge loops and remove the two edges marked in red, so you will keep a pure quad mesh
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "502"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
itmuckel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136969%2fclean-corners-for-subdivision%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Going into wireframe mode shows that the subdivision creates a fold in the model.
Creasing the sides of the star trek polygon pulls the fold out.
That basically solves my problem, because the render looks right, but the topology doesn't:
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Going into wireframe mode shows that the subdivision creates a fold in the model.
Creasing the sides of the star trek polygon pulls the fold out.
That basically solves my problem, because the render looks right, but the topology doesn't:
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Going into wireframe mode shows that the subdivision creates a fold in the model.
Creasing the sides of the star trek polygon pulls the fold out.
That basically solves my problem, because the render looks right, but the topology doesn't:
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Going into wireframe mode shows that the subdivision creates a fold in the model.
Creasing the sides of the star trek polygon pulls the fold out.
That basically solves my problem, because the render looks right, but the topology doesn't:
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
answered 4 hours ago
itmuckelitmuckel
1164
1164
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
itmuckel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason of this distortion is that it's a concave quad, and Subdivision Surface works better with clean quads. You can solve your problem with these tricks:
- add a single edge in the middle of the quad: you won't have any distortion with Subdivision Surface, but the resulting mesh contains triangles
- add this edge loops and remove the two edges marked in red, so you will keep a pure quad mesh
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason of this distortion is that it's a concave quad, and Subdivision Surface works better with clean quads. You can solve your problem with these tricks:
- add a single edge in the middle of the quad: you won't have any distortion with Subdivision Surface, but the resulting mesh contains triangles
- add this edge loops and remove the two edges marked in red, so you will keep a pure quad mesh
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason of this distortion is that it's a concave quad, and Subdivision Surface works better with clean quads. You can solve your problem with these tricks:
- add a single edge in the middle of the quad: you won't have any distortion with Subdivision Surface, but the resulting mesh contains triangles
- add this edge loops and remove the two edges marked in red, so you will keep a pure quad mesh
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
The reason of this distortion is that it's a concave quad, and Subdivision Surface works better with clean quads. You can solve your problem with these tricks:
- add a single edge in the middle of the quad: you won't have any distortion with Subdivision Surface, but the resulting mesh contains triangles
- add this edge loops and remove the two edges marked in red, so you will keep a pure quad mesh
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
answered 3 hours ago
G. GaroneG. Garone
561
561
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
G. Garone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's the problem: Either I have triangles or excess edge loops. I removed the green edges in the second picture, so I don't have to deal with them in unrelated parts of the mesh.
$endgroup$
– itmuckel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
itmuckel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
itmuckel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
itmuckel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
itmuckel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Blender Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136969%2fclean-corners-for-subdivision%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
