Ggthjy

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Create an outline of font

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Take groceries in checked luggage

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

Difference between "generating set" and free product?

Do warforged have souls?

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

3

I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."

What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?

18th-century language

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß
  
  – Agent_L
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."

What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?

18th-century language

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß
  
  – Agent_L
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."

What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?

18th-century language

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

edited 1 hour ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26626

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

23

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents


• How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?

share|improve this answer

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.
  
  – TonyK
  14 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.
  
  – sgf
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.
  
  – Denis de Bernardy
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52097%2fwhen-did-f-become-s-in-typeography-and-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

23

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents


• How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?

share|improve this answer

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.
  
  – TonyK
  14 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.
  
  – sgf
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.
  
  – Denis de Bernardy
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

23

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents


• How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?

share|improve this answer

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.
  
  – TonyK
  14 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.
  
  – sgf
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.
  
  – Denis de Bernardy
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents


• How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?

share|improve this answer

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

share|improve this answer

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

edited 32 mins ago

Laurel

3228

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555