Words and Words with “ver-” PrefixHow is the gender of new words established?German Accents: Austrian,...
Pre-1980's science fiction short story: alien disguised as a woman shot by a gangster, has tentacles coming out of her breasts when remaking her body
Broken patches on a road
Explain the objections to these measures against human trafficking
Placing an adverb between a verb and an object?
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
Typing Amharic inside a math equation?
Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing
Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?
What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?
Where are a monster’s hit dice found in the stat block?
Can a dragon be stuck looking like a human?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
What is the in-universe cost of a TIE fighter?
What makes the Forgotten Realms "forgotten"?
Word or phrase for showing great skill at something without formal training in it
Why is "points exist" not an axiom in geometry?
Process to change collation on a database
We are very unlucky in my court
How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?
How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL
Disable the ">" operator in Rstudio linux terminal
Solubility of a tribasic weak acid
How do I say "Brexit" in Latin?
Can an insurance company drop you after receiving a bill and refusing to pay?
Words and Words with “ver-” Prefix
How is the gender of new words established?German Accents: Austrian, German, or Swiss Standard GermanWhy do some dictionaries have Rad fahren and others radfahren? Is Rad a separable prefix?On the use of “Ad” + section number in a work of German philosophy from the early 1700'sWhen should you use “du” instead of “Sie”?Difference Between Das, Es, and DiesesWhat is the concept expressed with the word 'quasi' in day to day conversation?Da-preposition Words Before Dependent ClausesPresent tense with indicators of other time framesDuden Differences Between “an” and “in”
If a word and the same word with a "ver-" prefix mean "essentially" the same thing, are there any general differences between them? If so, what are they?
Examples:
Folgen / Verfolgen
Prügeln / Verprügeln
(Others that I can't remember... haha)
standard-german
add a comment |
If a word and the same word with a "ver-" prefix mean "essentially" the same thing, are there any general differences between them? If so, what are they?
Examples:
Folgen / Verfolgen
Prügeln / Verprügeln
(Others that I can't remember... haha)
standard-german
dingen - verdingen (jemanden dingen is a bit old-fashioned, though)
– Christian Geiselmann
2 days ago
4
I do actually think there are differences in meaning between "folgen" and "verfolgen", or "prügeln" and "verprügeln", i.e. they don't essentially mean the same thing. E.g. "Folgen" = "follow", while "verfolgen" = "prosecute, trail, chase, pursue".
– Rudy Velthuis
2 days ago
kommen - verkommen. In einem gewissen Sinne schon :-).
– user0
2 days ago
2
"Kaufen" and "Verkaufen" are certainly not essentially the same thing...
– BruceWayne
2 days ago
add a comment |
If a word and the same word with a "ver-" prefix mean "essentially" the same thing, are there any general differences between them? If so, what are they?
Examples:
Folgen / Verfolgen
Prügeln / Verprügeln
(Others that I can't remember... haha)
standard-german
If a word and the same word with a "ver-" prefix mean "essentially" the same thing, are there any general differences between them? If so, what are they?
Examples:
Folgen / Verfolgen
Prügeln / Verprügeln
(Others that I can't remember... haha)
standard-german
standard-german
asked 2 days ago
AaronAaron
3614
3614
dingen - verdingen (jemanden dingen is a bit old-fashioned, though)
– Christian Geiselmann
2 days ago
4
I do actually think there are differences in meaning between "folgen" and "verfolgen", or "prügeln" and "verprügeln", i.e. they don't essentially mean the same thing. E.g. "Folgen" = "follow", while "verfolgen" = "prosecute, trail, chase, pursue".
– Rudy Velthuis
2 days ago
kommen - verkommen. In einem gewissen Sinne schon :-).
– user0
2 days ago
2
"Kaufen" and "Verkaufen" are certainly not essentially the same thing...
– BruceWayne
2 days ago
add a comment |
dingen - verdingen (jemanden dingen is a bit old-fashioned, though)
– Christian Geiselmann
2 days ago
4
I do actually think there are differences in meaning between "folgen" and "verfolgen", or "prügeln" and "verprügeln", i.e. they don't essentially mean the same thing. E.g. "Folgen" = "follow", while "verfolgen" = "prosecute, trail, chase, pursue".
– Rudy Velthuis
2 days ago
kommen - verkommen. In einem gewissen Sinne schon :-).
– user0
2 days ago
2
"Kaufen" and "Verkaufen" are certainly not essentially the same thing...
– BruceWayne
2 days ago
dingen - verdingen (jemanden dingen is a bit old-fashioned, though)
– Christian Geiselmann
2 days ago
dingen - verdingen (jemanden dingen is a bit old-fashioned, though)
– Christian Geiselmann
2 days ago
4
4
I do actually think there are differences in meaning between "folgen" and "verfolgen", or "prügeln" and "verprügeln", i.e. they don't essentially mean the same thing. E.g. "Folgen" = "follow", while "verfolgen" = "prosecute, trail, chase, pursue".
– Rudy Velthuis
2 days ago
I do actually think there are differences in meaning between "folgen" and "verfolgen", or "prügeln" and "verprügeln", i.e. they don't essentially mean the same thing. E.g. "Folgen" = "follow", while "verfolgen" = "prosecute, trail, chase, pursue".
– Rudy Velthuis
2 days ago
kommen - verkommen. In einem gewissen Sinne schon :-).
– user0
2 days ago
kommen - verkommen. In einem gewissen Sinne schon :-).
– user0
2 days ago
2
2
"Kaufen" and "Verkaufen" are certainly not essentially the same thing...
– BruceWayne
2 days ago
"Kaufen" and "Verkaufen" are certainly not essentially the same thing...
– BruceWayne
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The function of the affix ver- are manifold in German. This is summarized in a rather concise list in the DWDS entry on its etymology (Pfeifer) (translation by me, examples from Pfeifer):
The prefix ver- is used to express that something/somebody is
- being removed, carried away: verrücken, vertreiben, verzerren
- vanishing, decays: verdunsten, verklingen, verschwinden
- misleading, going wrong: verführen, verwechseln, sich verzählen
- being negated: verbieten, versagen
- resulting in something: verbluten, verpacken, vertilgen
- is being intensified: verschließen, versperren
- made transitive from intransitive: verfolgen, verheiraten, verspotten
- a verbal derivation from an adjective: verdeutlichen, vergöttern, verarmen, verholzen
I believe the list may be incomplete but it should give you an idea. From your two examples verfolgen is resulting from folgen, verprügeln is an intensification from prügeln.
Over the time the original meaning of one or the other verb affixed with ver- may also get lost or changes, so it is always a good idea to look up a given verb in a dictionary.
Another recommended resource where you can look up if the prefix ver- exists for a given verb or noun is the "Wordformation" browser from canoo.net, in the link here shown for prügeln. You can not only see what prefixes or compounds exist but you can also click on any entry for more information including links to dictionaries.
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
add a comment |
Online-Duden gives the following list
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is depleted, eliminated or no longer exists as a result of the action.
Examples: verforschen, verfrühstücken, verwarten
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone spends time on doing something.
Examples: verschlafen, verschnarchen, verspielen
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone is doing something wrongly or incorrectly
Examples: verbremsen, verinszenieren
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is being impaired by an action
Examples: verwaschen, verwohnen
Has no impact at all on the meaning in conjuction with verbs
Examples: verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden
Thus, in many cases it is (5), but there are cases where the prefix actually changes the meaning of the base verb.
Fun fact: "ver-" is the most common prefix for German verbs - nearly 50% of the non-separable prefixed verbs start with it.
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49804%2fwords-and-words-with-ver-prefix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The function of the affix ver- are manifold in German. This is summarized in a rather concise list in the DWDS entry on its etymology (Pfeifer) (translation by me, examples from Pfeifer):
The prefix ver- is used to express that something/somebody is
- being removed, carried away: verrücken, vertreiben, verzerren
- vanishing, decays: verdunsten, verklingen, verschwinden
- misleading, going wrong: verführen, verwechseln, sich verzählen
- being negated: verbieten, versagen
- resulting in something: verbluten, verpacken, vertilgen
- is being intensified: verschließen, versperren
- made transitive from intransitive: verfolgen, verheiraten, verspotten
- a verbal derivation from an adjective: verdeutlichen, vergöttern, verarmen, verholzen
I believe the list may be incomplete but it should give you an idea. From your two examples verfolgen is resulting from folgen, verprügeln is an intensification from prügeln.
Over the time the original meaning of one or the other verb affixed with ver- may also get lost or changes, so it is always a good idea to look up a given verb in a dictionary.
Another recommended resource where you can look up if the prefix ver- exists for a given verb or noun is the "Wordformation" browser from canoo.net, in the link here shown for prügeln. You can not only see what prefixes or compounds exist but you can also click on any entry for more information including links to dictionaries.
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
add a comment |
The function of the affix ver- are manifold in German. This is summarized in a rather concise list in the DWDS entry on its etymology (Pfeifer) (translation by me, examples from Pfeifer):
The prefix ver- is used to express that something/somebody is
- being removed, carried away: verrücken, vertreiben, verzerren
- vanishing, decays: verdunsten, verklingen, verschwinden
- misleading, going wrong: verführen, verwechseln, sich verzählen
- being negated: verbieten, versagen
- resulting in something: verbluten, verpacken, vertilgen
- is being intensified: verschließen, versperren
- made transitive from intransitive: verfolgen, verheiraten, verspotten
- a verbal derivation from an adjective: verdeutlichen, vergöttern, verarmen, verholzen
I believe the list may be incomplete but it should give you an idea. From your two examples verfolgen is resulting from folgen, verprügeln is an intensification from prügeln.
Over the time the original meaning of one or the other verb affixed with ver- may also get lost or changes, so it is always a good idea to look up a given verb in a dictionary.
Another recommended resource where you can look up if the prefix ver- exists for a given verb or noun is the "Wordformation" browser from canoo.net, in the link here shown for prügeln. You can not only see what prefixes or compounds exist but you can also click on any entry for more information including links to dictionaries.
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
add a comment |
The function of the affix ver- are manifold in German. This is summarized in a rather concise list in the DWDS entry on its etymology (Pfeifer) (translation by me, examples from Pfeifer):
The prefix ver- is used to express that something/somebody is
- being removed, carried away: verrücken, vertreiben, verzerren
- vanishing, decays: verdunsten, verklingen, verschwinden
- misleading, going wrong: verführen, verwechseln, sich verzählen
- being negated: verbieten, versagen
- resulting in something: verbluten, verpacken, vertilgen
- is being intensified: verschließen, versperren
- made transitive from intransitive: verfolgen, verheiraten, verspotten
- a verbal derivation from an adjective: verdeutlichen, vergöttern, verarmen, verholzen
I believe the list may be incomplete but it should give you an idea. From your two examples verfolgen is resulting from folgen, verprügeln is an intensification from prügeln.
Over the time the original meaning of one or the other verb affixed with ver- may also get lost or changes, so it is always a good idea to look up a given verb in a dictionary.
Another recommended resource where you can look up if the prefix ver- exists for a given verb or noun is the "Wordformation" browser from canoo.net, in the link here shown for prügeln. You can not only see what prefixes or compounds exist but you can also click on any entry for more information including links to dictionaries.
The function of the affix ver- are manifold in German. This is summarized in a rather concise list in the DWDS entry on its etymology (Pfeifer) (translation by me, examples from Pfeifer):
The prefix ver- is used to express that something/somebody is
- being removed, carried away: verrücken, vertreiben, verzerren
- vanishing, decays: verdunsten, verklingen, verschwinden
- misleading, going wrong: verführen, verwechseln, sich verzählen
- being negated: verbieten, versagen
- resulting in something: verbluten, verpacken, vertilgen
- is being intensified: verschließen, versperren
- made transitive from intransitive: verfolgen, verheiraten, verspotten
- a verbal derivation from an adjective: verdeutlichen, vergöttern, verarmen, verholzen
I believe the list may be incomplete but it should give you an idea. From your two examples verfolgen is resulting from folgen, verprügeln is an intensification from prügeln.
Over the time the original meaning of one or the other verb affixed with ver- may also get lost or changes, so it is always a good idea to look up a given verb in a dictionary.
Another recommended resource where you can look up if the prefix ver- exists for a given verb or noun is the "Wordformation" browser from canoo.net, in the link here shown for prügeln. You can not only see what prefixes or compounds exist but you can also click on any entry for more information including links to dictionaries.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Takkat♦Takkat
58.2k17124359
58.2k17124359
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
add a comment |
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
"verheiraten" is an odd example. Isn’t "heiraten" already transitive?
– idmean
2 days ago
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
@idmean You can say "Wir heiraten" or "ich heirate dich", but the subject of "verheiraten" would be neither bride nor broom (perhaps a parent or a priest)
– Hagen von Eitzen
yesterday
add a comment |
Online-Duden gives the following list
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is depleted, eliminated or no longer exists as a result of the action.
Examples: verforschen, verfrühstücken, verwarten
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone spends time on doing something.
Examples: verschlafen, verschnarchen, verspielen
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone is doing something wrongly or incorrectly
Examples: verbremsen, verinszenieren
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is being impaired by an action
Examples: verwaschen, verwohnen
Has no impact at all on the meaning in conjuction with verbs
Examples: verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden
Thus, in many cases it is (5), but there are cases where the prefix actually changes the meaning of the base verb.
Fun fact: "ver-" is the most common prefix for German verbs - nearly 50% of the non-separable prefixed verbs start with it.
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
add a comment |
Online-Duden gives the following list
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is depleted, eliminated or no longer exists as a result of the action.
Examples: verforschen, verfrühstücken, verwarten
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone spends time on doing something.
Examples: verschlafen, verschnarchen, verspielen
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone is doing something wrongly or incorrectly
Examples: verbremsen, verinszenieren
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is being impaired by an action
Examples: verwaschen, verwohnen
Has no impact at all on the meaning in conjuction with verbs
Examples: verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden
Thus, in many cases it is (5), but there are cases where the prefix actually changes the meaning of the base verb.
Fun fact: "ver-" is the most common prefix for German verbs - nearly 50% of the non-separable prefixed verbs start with it.
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
add a comment |
Online-Duden gives the following list
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is depleted, eliminated or no longer exists as a result of the action.
Examples: verforschen, verfrühstücken, verwarten
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone spends time on doing something.
Examples: verschlafen, verschnarchen, verspielen
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone is doing something wrongly or incorrectly
Examples: verbremsen, verinszenieren
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is being impaired by an action
Examples: verwaschen, verwohnen
Has no impact at all on the meaning in conjuction with verbs
Examples: verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden
Thus, in many cases it is (5), but there are cases where the prefix actually changes the meaning of the base verb.
Fun fact: "ver-" is the most common prefix for German verbs - nearly 50% of the non-separable prefixed verbs start with it.
Online-Duden gives the following list
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is depleted, eliminated or no longer exists as a result of the action.
Examples: verforschen, verfrühstücken, verwarten
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone spends time on doing something.
Examples: verschlafen, verschnarchen, verspielen
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that someone is doing something wrongly or incorrectly
Examples: verbremsen, verinszenieren
Expresses in conjuction with verbs that something is being impaired by an action
Examples: verwaschen, verwohnen
Has no impact at all on the meaning in conjuction with verbs
Examples: verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden
Thus, in many cases it is (5), but there are cases where the prefix actually changes the meaning of the base verb.
Fun fact: "ver-" is the most common prefix for German verbs - nearly 50% of the non-separable prefixed verbs start with it.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
tofrotofro
43.2k145131
43.2k145131
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
add a comment |
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
Errrm - the first 3 entries appear to be missing. Apart from that, and to be honest, I do not believe in this Duden list. I mean, why do they come up with verforschen, verinszenieren, verfeaturen? These are not really common verbs, at least not in my microenvironment. Also, I must disagree that verbleiben, verbringen, vermelden are identical to bleiben, bringen, melden. A word of critisism may be worth to be included in your answer (still +1 from me because this list is way out of your responsibility).
– Takkat♦
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
@Takkat The first 3 entries in the Duden do not refer to verbs, so do not apply to this question. With regards to the selected examples - maybe not the most common examples, but work for me.
– tofro
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49804%2fwords-and-words-with-ver-prefix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
dingen - verdingen (jemanden dingen is a bit old-fashioned, though)
– Christian Geiselmann
2 days ago
4
I do actually think there are differences in meaning between "folgen" and "verfolgen", or "prügeln" and "verprügeln", i.e. they don't essentially mean the same thing. E.g. "Folgen" = "follow", while "verfolgen" = "prosecute, trail, chase, pursue".
– Rudy Velthuis
2 days ago
kommen - verkommen. In einem gewissen Sinne schon :-).
– user0
2 days ago
2
"Kaufen" and "Verkaufen" are certainly not essentially the same thing...
– BruceWayne
2 days ago